[cisco-voip] MGCP vs H323?

[Philip Walenta]

Yes you can.  I frequently do MGCP PRI and H323 FXO.
 
Can't use ccm auto config though.  It wants to control everything.

  _____  

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 4:26 PM
To: Aman Chugh; Robert Kulagowski
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] MGCP vs H323?


This is an excellent document - too bad Cisco doesn't have anything like
this.
 
Can I have a router using MGCP on some ports and H323 on others?
 
 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Aman  <mailto:aman.chugh at gmail.com> Chugh 
To: Robert Kulagowski <mailto:bob at smalltime.com>  
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] MGCP vs H323?

Robert,
 
Check out the attachment. not entirely my compilation,
 
Hope this helps.
 
Merry Christmas !
 
Aman

 
On 12/23/06, Robert Kulagowski <bob at smalltime.com> wrote: 

Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
> Anyone have any pointers to a Cisco document that explain the difference
> between MGCP and H323? Namely, what features are available with one or
> the other?

H.323 supports call preservation going in and out of SRST mode.
H.323 supports digit manipulation on calling / called number for inbound 
and outbound calls.
MGCP has caller name and caller ID delivery to the phone; H.323 will
only deliver caller ID.
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip





  _____  




_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20061223/d0becac2/attachment.html