[cisco-voip] Another CDR question :)

Wes Sisk wsisk at cisco.com
Thu Feb 9 15:44:51 EST 2006


At that point it depends on the types of endpoints in use.  We had this 
problem with both PRI and t1-cas integrations, both of which are fixed 
in everything recent.

Scott - are you talking about your 'interesting' QSIG transfer scenario?

/Wes

Voll, Scott wrote:
> Is there any way to fix that?
>
> I have multiple issues with a PBX integration that it doesn't send DTMF
> without the Connect message.  Any way to push the connect through?
>
> Thanks
>
> Scott
>
> PS.  Thanks Ed for letting me high jack your thread. ;-)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Ratliff
> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 7:39 AM
> To: Ed Leatherman
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Another CDR question :)
>
> Many IVRs will not actually put the call into a Connected state until  
> you reach an agent.  Also happens with carriers that ask you for a  
> pin when dialing long distance, etc.
>
> I think Amex was one that generated a ton of cases back in the day  
> because of dtmf issues when the voice path was established but the  
> call wasn't yet connected.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Feb 8, 2006, at 10:32 AM, Ed Leatherman wrote:
>
> Was looking through some CDRs to dig up some stats on a disputed long  
> distance call.. Happened to notice there were a number of calls that  
> had a dateTimeOrigination that was normal, a dateTimeConnect which  
> was 0, and a dateTimeDisconnect that was normal and anywhere from 3  
> to 20 sec later than the Origination Time. Does this mean the call  
> failed to connect? duration on all those calls is also 0. the  
> dateTimeConnect has me a little puzzled.
>
>   



More information about the cisco-voip mailing list