[cisco-voip] Another CDR question :)
Wes Sisk
wsisk at cisco.com
Thu Feb 9 15:44:51 EST 2006
At that point it depends on the types of endpoints in use. We had this
problem with both PRI and t1-cas integrations, both of which are fixed
in everything recent.
Scott - are you talking about your 'interesting' QSIG transfer scenario?
/Wes
Voll, Scott wrote:
> Is there any way to fix that?
>
> I have multiple issues with a PBX integration that it doesn't send DTMF
> without the Connect message. Any way to push the connect through?
>
> Thanks
>
> Scott
>
> PS. Thanks Ed for letting me high jack your thread. ;-)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Ratliff
> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 7:39 AM
> To: Ed Leatherman
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Another CDR question :)
>
> Many IVRs will not actually put the call into a Connected state until
> you reach an agent. Also happens with carriers that ask you for a
> pin when dialing long distance, etc.
>
> I think Amex was one that generated a ton of cases back in the day
> because of dtmf issues when the voice path was established but the
> call wasn't yet connected.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Feb 8, 2006, at 10:32 AM, Ed Leatherman wrote:
>
> Was looking through some CDRs to dig up some stats on a disputed long
> distance call.. Happened to notice there were a number of calls that
> had a dateTimeOrigination that was normal, a dateTimeConnect which
> was 0, and a dateTimeDisconnect that was normal and anywhere from 3
> to 20 sec later than the Origination Time. Does this mean the call
> failed to connect? duration on all those calls is also 0. the
> dateTimeConnect has me a little puzzled.
>
>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list