[cisco-voip] *67 route pattern with calling line set to restricted

[Erick Bergquist]

This is Q931 translator of call made... 1234 shows up
on phone as calling party number instead of nothing or
private, etc. 1234 is phones extension and RP does not
have external party mask checked and is set to
restricted. 

SETUP  pd = 8  callref = 0x1EB6
Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2
Channel ID i = 0xA98393
Calling Party Number i = '!', 0x81, '1234'
Called Party Number i = 0x80, '1235556666'

--- Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:

> yep.  look check the ccm trace with q931 translator
> to make sure  
> we're setting it properly.
> 
> also might be worth a check with Dialed Number
> Analyzer to see what  
> it says.
> 
> /Wes
> 
> On Feb 9, 2006, at 8:52 PM, Erick Bergquist wrote:
> 
> Yea, the route group/detail and gateway is set to
> default and on route pattern is set to restricted,
> so
> the settings on the route pattern should pass
> through
> right?
> 
> --- Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> > it's configurable
> > 1.on the route pattern
> > 2. where the route gruop is made a member of the
> > route list
> > 3. on the gateway.
> >
> > check all of those.  there is a slim chance the
> PSTN
> > is not honoring the
> > setting.  all you can do to validate that is use
> > q931 translator to look
> > at the outbound SETUP from CM.  the privacy bits
> are
> > part of the called
> > party number and q931 translator decodes nicely.
> >
> > /Wes
> >
> > Erick Bergquist wrote:
> >> Have a situation where have a few 9*67.xxxxxxx
> > route
> >> patterns and the external party mask is
> unchecked,
> > and
> >> calling line presentation is set to restricted on
> > RP.
> >> Route detail is set to default as well as
> > gateway/MGCP
> >> endpoint. But when calls go out the outside
> caller
> > is
> >> seeing the calling party number still.
> >>
> >> The gateway is a 6608. Anyone know what to look
> > for in
> >> the traces to verify the call is going out as
> >> restricted? These *67 patterns used to work in
> > past
> >> I'm being told.
> >>
> >> If you prefix *67 on called party number so it
> > goes
> >> out PRI with *67 the call fails.
> >>
> >> thanks
> >>
> >>
> __________________________________________________
> >> Do You Yahoo!?
> >> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > protection around
> >> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >>
> >
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com