[cisco-voip] Gateway CSS

[Voll, Scott]

It all depends on if you have any overlap.  For instance if you have two
sites, each with DID's coming in on PRI's with overlapping DID's.  you
would not want the CSS of GW A to know about the Site B partitions as it
could route the call to someone at site B rather then site A.

 

I had to change the CSS of one of my GW's as we are able to dial 0 for
the receptionist but that overlapped with a DN of 0158.  Caused some
problems until I changed the CSS of the GW.

 

But in general, unless you have a reason not too, you could do this.

 

Scott

 

________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ciscozest
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 7:16 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Gateway CSS

 

Would it do any harm if we set Gateway CSS (inbound) to contain all
configured partitions? I worry if this could cause toll-fraud.

On second thought, I realized telco will always send fixed DID numbers
to the gateway, thus setting the gateway CSS to contain internal
partition is enough and secure. What is the best practice we should
follow? Any idea? Thanks

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20060215/8d67ec4c/attachment-0001.html