[cisco-voip] Smallest Cheapest VGW

[Justin Steinberg]

I believe this is how the E-911 server works.  Relys on having
different emergency locations assigned to different DIDs.  The E911
server then routes calls through the appropriate RP that changes the
calling party number.

I'm not sure if all telcos support this at this time.

Justin

> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:51:54 -0500
> From: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Smallest Cheapest VGW
> To: "Voll, Scott" <Scott.Voll at wesd.org>, <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID: <009001c6333a$d1deff10$c801a8c0 at deadfish>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Some carriers offer a service whereby you can assign a specific emergency record to a number on your PRI service. If you can get this, than you can configure route patterns appropriately so that 911 calls from these phones still go out your main site but are tagged with the site specific number, therefore, bringing up the right emergency record.
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: Voll, Scott
>  To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>  Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 2:00 PM
>  Subject: [cisco-voip] Smallest Cheapest VGW
>
>
>  I have a remote site (across the street) connected via Fiber to the Central Site.  All PSTN calls go out the main site.  I'm a little concerned about 911 calls.  So I'm thinking I may want to put a little VGW with a FXO over there for 911 Calls.  Not because I'm worried about the Fiber but because I want 911 to have the correct address 2600 not 2611.
>
>
>
>  What is the smallest mgcp VGW I can get that will just take IP to 911 out a FXO port.  No routing needed.  Something like a ATA would be great.  ( I know an ATA won't work, but that's kinda what I'm looking for).  At 2801 seems to be a little over kill.
>
>
>
>  Scott
>
>