[cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw

[Kevin Thorngren]

I responded too quickly, too late in the evening :-)  The default dial  
peer is matched for inbound calls.  Try using "debug voip ccapi inout"  
to see what is happening with the call.  Maybe we can take a look at  
this along with your config (sanitize as needed).

Kevin
On Jan 26, 2006, at 7:53 PM, Kevin Thorngren wrote:

> You are matching the default dial peer which is hidden.  Please read  
> the following:
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk90/ 
> technologies_tech_note09186a008010fed1.shtml
>
> Kevin
> On Jan 26, 2005, at 5:57 PM, James Grace wrote:
>
>>
>> Ok   well the concern is that all call are working fine. Even thou we  
>> do not see the dialpeer.  So we are clueless on how calls are going  
>> out with out the dial peer.  We know that they are going out the  
>> right gw but doing debugs q931 921
>>  
>>
>> From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll at wesd.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 5:21 PM
>> To: James Grace
>> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw
>>  
>> I think your other engineer is right.  But I don’t have any doc’s to  
>> back it up.
>>  
>> I know on my 3640 with PRI I put in a pots dial peer of  9991024 as  
>> my PRI is in slot1 port 0.
>>  
>> dial-peer voice 9991024 pots
>>  destination-pattern 9T
>>  incoming called-number .
>>  direct-inward-dial
>>  
>> I do remember manually putting it in. 
>>  
>> Scott
>>  
>> Sorry, it’s been years.
>>  
>>
>> From: James Grace [mailto:jgrace at digitelusa.net]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 10:48 AM
>> To: Voll, Scott
>> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw
>>  
>> Hey Voll you seem to have all the answers.  So I thank you for all  
>> the help..   I have a question that me and another engineer have a  
>> issue with.  Can you explain to me or help me understand why   on a  
>> mgcp gw,  we do not see a dial peer in the config for the pri  
>> endpoint ( like you would see after confuring fxo and fxs end points  
>> in cm)  and how would I explain why there isn’t suppose to be one in  
>> the cli conf.  my other engineer seems to thing that you should add  
>> one manully to the cli gw
>>  
>>
>> From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll at wesd.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 12:19 PM
>> To: James Grace
>> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw
>>  
>> But is the conference calling resource at the remote site or the  
>> central site.  If it’s at the central site then the transcoding is  
>> just need at the central site.  Now if the conference calling  
>> resource is at the remote site, yes you will need transcoding at the  
>> remote site.
>>  
>> Scott
>>  
>>
>> From: James Grace [mailto:jgrace at digitelusa.net]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 8:56 AM
>> To: Voll, Scott
>> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw
>>  
>> Yes we are doing conf call internal at the srst and conf calling  
>> between the srst and main. 
>>  
>>
>> From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll at wesd.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 11:36 AM
>> To: James Grace
>> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw
>>  
>> James—
>>  
>> You are going to setup regions to your remote sites so you can use  
>> G729.  That I understand.  Do you have some kind of resource at the  
>> remote site that only does G711 that you’re other sites need to get  
>> too?  That would be the only reason I can think of for needing  
>> transcoding resources at the remote site. 
>>  
>> I have transcoding resources at the central site because I have IPCCx  
>> that only does G711.  So if a remote site is using G729 the central  
>> site transcodes it to G711 so they can make the call to the IPCCx  
>> pilot point.
>>  
>> Are you doing conferencing calling resources at the remote site that  
>> would require transcoding at the remote site?
>>  
>> Scott
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>
>> From: James Grace [mailto:jgrace at digitelusa.net]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 8:25 AM
>> To: Voll, Scott
>> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw
>>  
>> First thanks for the reply
>>  
>> I was told that i need to set up region for srst with codec 7.29 and  
>> set up transcoding on the srst gw to dedicate a few dsp fo r  
>> transcoding
>>  
>>
>> From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll at wesd.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 11:03 AM
>> To: James Grace; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw
>>  
>> What is the reason for having transcoding on your SRST gw?
>>  
>> If your in SRST you would be using the PSTN. 
>>  
>> Scott
>>  
>>
>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net  
>> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of James Grace
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 7:37 AM
>> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw
>>  
>> I was told that I need to configure transcoding on my srst gw. And  
>> not sure  way. Is this really needed.  And if I set up a media  
>> resource groups for my srst site, the available resources are on the  
>> cms at the main site.  So the question is if I create one for srst  
>> and use the avil resource isn’t that the same as using none or the  
>> default
>>  
>> James D. Grace
>> CCNP CCNA MCSE MCDBA
>> Sr. System Engineer / Professional Svc.
>> Digitel Corporation
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 17359 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20060126/fdafca68/attachment.bin