[cisco-voip] CME 4.0 and after hours restrictions..

[Jim McBurnett]

Thanks Kevin..

Later,
Jim 

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Thorngren [mailto:kthorngr at cisco.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 1:42 PM
To: Jim McBurnett
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CME 4.0 and after hours restrictions..

I would agree that the wording is misleading.  I will see if I can have
this changed a bit.  No promises though as I don't control the docs on
CCO :-)

Kevin
On Jul 5, 2006, at 1:36 PM, Jim McBurnett wrote:

> Kevin,
> Well, now that makes it clear as day..
>
> I did miss this...
> But should the CME docs as least say that SCCP ports are included in 
> the after hours restrictions and not say FXS ports are excluded?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Jim
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Thorngren [mailto:kthorngr at cisco.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 8:36 AM
> To: Jim McBurnett
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CME 4.0 and after hours restrictions..
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Yes, the EVM-HD module can be SCCP controlled:
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6441/
> products_feature_guide09186a0
> 080483a76.html#wp1304136
>
> Kevin
> On Jul 3, 2006, at 11:18 PM, Jim McBurnett wrote:
>
>> Well, now I hadn't thought about that..BUT I didn't think that option

>> existed except on a VG224, or ATA.
>>
>> This is on an EVM-HD module, so is there something I am missing in 
>> the
>
>> docs?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jim
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kevin Thorngren [mailto:kthorngr at cisco.com]
>> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 9:42 PM
>> To: Jim McBurnett
>> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CME 4.0 and after hours restrictions..
>>
>> Are these SCCP controlled FXS ports?  If so then I would say the call

>> blocking feature of CME would be enforced since these ports are 
>> controlled by CME.  I don' have a way to test this at the moment 
>> though.
>>
>> Kevin
>> On Jul 3, 2006, at 9:12 PM, Jim McBurnett wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I was wondering if I was the only one that thinks the CME4.0 manual 
>>> is
>>
>>> wrong on call blocking...
>>> ON CME 4.0, if you have a block pattern in place it affects the FXS 
>>> ports and the IP phones.
>>> The book says it should not..
>>>
>>> Anyone else seen this?
>>>
>>> My config was simple--
>>> I blocked 91 as the pattern.
>>> I could not dial 918005551212 from the FXS ports.. I took it off and

>>> it worked..
>>> This is set for 1 min shy of 24 hours... So it can overridded....
>>>
>>> My step is a TAC case, but just wanted a sanity check....
>>>
>>> Later,
>>> J
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>
>