[cisco-voip] Switch Upgrade causing fits!
Ted Nugent
tednugent69 at yahoo.com
Sun Jul 16 09:20:33 EDT 2006
No Sorry, thats not what I meant, I meant that if you
were to ONLY lock in one side you could get away
locking in speed but not Duplex. As a general rule I
lock in BOTH sides of all server and router ports and
leave all my phone ports as Auto. Unless both sides of
a server link supports 1000MBps then I leave the ports
as auto, I've seen a ton of weird occurances when I've
tried locking in a Gig port in the past?
--- Todd Franklin <toddnh65 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Ted. A pretty good (ok excellent) document
> from Cisco. But are you
> saying that I should hard code all my switch ports
> for speed? I mean, I'll
> display my stupidity here, but I wouldn't know what
> speed the phone connects
> at!! And most of the phones have a pc hanging off
> of them. I think I am
> getting very close to a solution here, and that
> would be so nice! (I like
> your screenname by the way, sort of "cat Scratch
> fevery"!!!)
>
> But what's REALLY odd, is that the 3560 never
> displays any errors on the
> port....even though, RARELY, the server will have in
> the event log that the
> NIC card lost connection, then regained connection.
>
> Todd
>
> On 7/15/06, Ted Nugent <tednugent69 at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Check out this link. I don't know how many
> customers
> > I've worked with that have locked in the switch
> side
> > and not the terminal side (phone/PC) and can't
> > understand why they are having issues. You can get
> > away with locking in speed in most cases for
> 10/100
> > but auto-neg of duplex is a handshake deal and if
> one
> > side isn't talking your SOL.. Not saying this is
> you
> > issue but this link explains it pretty well and
> might
> > track down the issue.
> >
> > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/46.html
> >
> >
> > --- Todd Franklin <toddnh65 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > We were using a CE500 at our Altrim site, but
> when
> > > we added more people, we
> > > bumped to a 3560. Our server constantly seems
> to
> > > lose connection with the
> > > unit! (Yet, according to port counters, no
> errors
> > > are seen). (we went for
> > > 4 users with phone and data, to 12 users with
> phone
> > > and data. all 7940s)
> > >
> > > Has anyone seen this? I have had people say
> "DON'T
> > > set the port speed on
> > > both the server AND the switch, but DO set it on
> one
> > > of them."
> > >
> > > Is the 3560 less forgiving?? I'll take any
> hints at
> > > all, so I won't have to
> > > be here all weekend long!!
> > > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-voip mailing list
> > > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > >
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> > >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list