[cisco-voip] Setting up local DSP resources on 2821

Tue Jul 18 16:40:01 EDT 2006

I think I've open multiple TAC cases on that error.... and it's a
cosmetic error.

TAC had me up the RTMT alert level from the default to 6 per hour and
that seems to fix it for me..... 

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Erik Erasmus
(E)
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 1:27 PM
To: Voll, Scott; Wydra, Jason; Ted Nugent; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Setting up local DSP resources on 2821

NO

I don't think you are missing something. You are right as far as I am
concerned. For my remote sites I will only set up conferencing.
Because the phones are in a region which uses G729 to other sites
across the wan they will natively without transcoding support G729.

Probably misleading from my  side because I talked like they had it in
the example for both xcoding and conferencing

While we talk about it - MTP too ?? I am not sure I will need any MTP
at remote sites or at HQ for that matter - just simple G729 voice
calls across a wan link, G711 in the branch - all cisco iP phones,
ATAs with 4 faxes. Or does anyone have a simple explanation of what
would typically require MTP in a stock standard CCM solution with
remote branches

 Having said that I picked up something very strange at my HQ. Call
Manager is complaining that it does not have enough MTP resources and
I  not sure why because the same applies at my HQ. This is in the
event viewer application logg. At HQ All cisco IP phones - G711 in HQ
but G729 across wan to other sites, no voicemail, no IPCC just ccm
conferencing, and the default unicast MOH  and the rest on defaults
for about 150 users. I am busy capturing traces now to try and figure
out why the error messages in the event viewer application logs.

I don't know if you have seen this before

MtpNoMoreResourcesAvailable - No more MTP resources available.
  App ID: Cisco CallManager
  Cluster ID: StandAloneCluster
  Node ID: 10.x.x.x.
Explanation: MTP resource is not available.
Recommended Action: Install additional MTP or transcoder resources..

I think I also saw a similar message but where it says MTP/transcoding
resources not available

------------------

Erik Erasmus -----Original Message-----
From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll at wesd.org]
Sent: 18 July 2006 10:08 PM
To: Erik Erasmus (E); Wydra, Jason; Ted Nugent;
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Setting up local DSP resources on 2821

Why does everyone want Transcoding at the remote sites?  I can
understand conferencing but the head end is where all the xcoding
would
be done or I'm missing something.  Are you running something like IPCC
at remote sites?

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Erik Erasmus
(E)
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 12:55 PM
To: Wydra, Jason; Ted Nugent; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Setting up local DSP resources on 2821

I was wondering about the same thing

I will have a PVDM2-8 for normal termination of the BRIs and probably
a PVDM2-32 for the conferencing  /transcoding

Erik Erasmus

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Wydra, Jason
Sent: 18 July 2006 09:46 PM
To: Ted Nugent; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Setting up local DSP resources on 2821

One more thing with the following....

voice-card 0
 dspfarm
 dsp services dspfarm

If I run a show diag, I see two PVDM2-32 modules. One is slot 0 and
the
other is slot 1. Does the voice-card command above denote the actual
slot number of the PVDM? Reason I ask is because I want the PVDM in
slot
0 to do transcoding and the PVDM in slot 1 to do conferencing. When I
try to configure the following I get this:

ft-worth(config)#voice-card 1
                            ^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.

ft-worth(config)#voice-card ?
  <0-2>  Voice interface slot #

ft-worth(config)#voice-card

Thanks,
Jason
-----Original Message-----
From: Ted Nugent [mailto:tednugent69 at yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 12:46 PM
To: Wydra, Jason; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Setting up local DSP resources on 2821

You need it all... confusing at first but after you
set it up a couple times it's not so bad.

Makes me miss the old NM-HDV config :-/

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios123/123cgc
r/
vvfax_c/callc_c/ccm_c/intcnf2.htm#wp1061433

voice-card 0
 dspfarm
 dsp services dspfarm
!
!
sccp local FA0/0
sccp ccm <pub-ipaddr> identifier 2 version 4.0
sccp ccm <sub-ipaddr> identifier 1 version 4.0
sccp ip precedence 3
sccp
!
sccp ccm group 1
 associate ccm 2 priority 2
 associate ccm 1 priority 1
 associate profile 2 register <site>xcode
 associate profile 1 register <site>conf
 keepalive retries 5
 switchover method immediate
 switchback method immediate
 switchback interval 15
!
dspfarm profile 2 transcode
 codec g711ulaw
 codec g711alaw
 codec g729ar8
 codec g729abr8
 codec gsmfr
 maximum sessions 12
 associate application SCCP
!
dspfarm profile 1 conference
 codec g711ulaw
 codec g711alaw
 codec g729ar8
 codec g729abr8
 codec g729r8
 codec g729br8
 maximum sessions 8
 associate application SCCP

--- "Wydra, Jason" <jwydra at Burwood.com> wrote:

> Does anyone have a good example config on how to set
> this up? I have two
> onboard PVDM2 32 channel modules in my 2821. I want
> the local router to
> hit the gateway first for MTP, Conference and
> Transcoding. Then CCM
> 4.1.3. I have the Cisco procedure but I'm wondering
> if I really need to
> configure everything they are suggesting. Looks like
> it might require
> multiple dspfarm profiles for all the services I
> want to provide.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Jason Wydra
>
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This e-mail and its contents are subject to the Telkom SA Limited
e-mail legal notice available at
http://www.telkom.co.za/TelkomEMailLegalNotice.PDF
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This e-mail and its contents are subject to the Telkom SA Limited
e-mail legal notice available at
http://www.telkom.co.za/TelkomEMailLegalNotice.PDF
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip