[cisco-voip] Using VWIC-2MFT card with voice and data

[Wes Sisk]

Be leary.  i believe the 2t cards have a limitation that they must  
clock against the same TDM clock.  If you hook up 2 different clock  
sources you will start taking L1 errors.

/Wes

On Jul 18, 2006, at 9:44 AM, Chris Ellington wrote:

This is the doc I was looking for!

And out of frustration, I tried configuring it last night and it  
worked – before, when I would configure a pri-group on the second  
controller, I got an error but now it’s letting me configure it.

So now we can start selling 2 port cards – one for voice the other  
for data rather than two single port cards.

Thanks for all of the help, from the only listserv I subscribe to  
anymore due to the excellent signal/noise ratio.

Chris


On 7/17/06 7:48 PM, "ash AD" <commo_ssg_31f at yahoo.com> wrote:

> I have always been told no, this could not be done but some  
> documentation says otherwise. Maybe the below URLs is what you are  
> refering to:
>
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps5855/ 
> products_qanda_item0900aecd8028d2e5.shtml
>
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2617/ 
> products_configuration_example09186a008052c920.shtml
>
>
> Let us know if you make it work.
>
>
>
> Peter Casanave
>
> "Jason Aarons (US)" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com> wrote:
>
>> Only issues might be clocking from different sources on the two T1s.
>> There are clocking limitations on the VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1. However in
>> general it does work, I have lots of sites with this configuration.
>>
>> I would try and stick with a WIC1-DSU if you not sure on the telco
>> clocking -jason
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris  
>> Ellington
>> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 10:30 AM
>> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: [cisco-voip] Using VWIC-2MFT card with voice and data
>>
>> I know it hasn't been supported to use a 2MFT card with one port  
>> T1 data
>> and the other port PRI but I seem to remember seeing a doc stating  
>> that
>> it was supported.
>>
>> At present, my TAC engineer thinks I nuts and can't find the doc.
>>
>> Anyone on the list recall seeing this?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Chris


-- 
Christopher S. Ellington
CCIE #6814
Network Solutions, Inc.
(317) 566 8897
Chris.Ellington at nsi1.com
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20060718/3025f23f/attachment.html