[cisco-voip] Unified vs. not...

[Jonathan Charles]

To be honest, if you aren't doing Unified, then you should probably
not spend the cash for Unity and just get Cisco Unity Connections
instead...

However, it seems that migrating from Unified to VM only should be
straight-forward, just point your email clients at a different mail
store (Notes, different Exchange, etc)...

The question is why you would want to reduce functionality, unless you
are getting short of disk space and need to move vmails off of your
corp Exchange...

The problem is in the migration itself. Moving chunks of mailboxes is
not feasibile (unless you are a masochist and love exmerge).



Jonathan

On 5/12/06, Voll, Scott <Scott.Voll at wesd.org> wrote:
> You are just creating a email box that no one has access to except the
> users phone.
>
> Or my understanding of Unity 4.2 is you could create two mail stores one
> that is your UM and the other that is your VM only.
>
> I have done the first..... what a waste of a mail box IMHO.
>
> Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jim McBurnett
> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 11:57 AM
> To: ciscovoip
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Unified vs. not...
>
> Ok,
> Some time ago I remember reading about a tool that could convert a
> unified mailbox to a standard mail box..
>
> After thinking about this I can't see any way this will work.
> If the message store is off box exchange, then there can't be a standard
> voice mail box...
>
> But am I just having a lost memory event?
>
> Thanks,
> J
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>