[cisco-voip] Any word on running IPT through FWSM

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

my apologies, the webcast was yesterday. and i was all excited to view it.

it's being archived as we speak and should be available later this week.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Network Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Sanity First : Number of days with fewer than
50 messages in my inbox at the end of the day:   buffer overrun
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Lelio Fulgenzi 
  To: Voll, Scott ; Wes Sisk 
  Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 12:38 PM
  Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Any word on running IPT through FWSM


  We had a very good meeting with our Account Team and the consensus was to stay away from firewalls for now. Just to complicated and the little bit of protection over extended ACLs was not worth the extra effort. The end result was to use extended ACLs with antivirus and host based IPS (security agent) along with common server based security. We've all but committed to this roadmap.

  There is a webcast today you might want to look at:

  Secure IP Communications: Simple Steps to Secure Voice
  Available from 23-MAY-2006 to 23-NOV-2006 

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
  Network Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
  (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
  Sanity First : Number of days with fewer than
  50 messages in my inbox at the end of the day:   buffer overrun
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Voll, Scott 
    To: Wes Sisk 
    Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
    Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 12:29 PM
    Subject: [cisco-voip] Any word on running IPT through FWSM


    Wes-

     

    At CIPTUG it was stated that IPT through a FWSM was not recommended.  Has anything changed with 3.1 code?

     

    Scott



----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    _______________________________________________
    cisco-voip mailing list
    cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
    https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20060524/8eb261e3/attachment.html