[cisco-voip] Upgrade Server

STEVEN CASPER SCASPER at mandtbank.com
Sat Nov 11 17:29:09 EST 2006


No, you can use a 3.4 and a 3.0 but no 3.2, that hertz! Oh well by the
time we would worry about upgrading to CM 6.0 it will be time for a
server refresh anyway.

>>> "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com> 11/11/06 1:52 PM >>>
does the platform match those described here down to processor speed?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/voiceapp/ps378/ 
prod_brochure_list.html

In 4.x we generally check minimum amount of memory, number of HD, and 

minimum HD size.
Processor speed is occasionally verified.

In 5.x processor speed is verified.  Minimum amount of memory, number 

of HD, and minimum HD size.

/Wes

On Nov 10, 2006, at 1:12 PM, STEVEN CASPER wrote:

I have DL380 G4 servers using dual Dual Xeon 3.2ghz processor. 4.1.3
installed with no problem but is this going to cause me issues down
the
road?

Thanks!

Steve Casper
Voice Technologies
M&T Bank
(410) 347-6026

>>> "Andre Beck" <cisco-voip at ibh.net> 11/03/06 4:45 PM >>>
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 10:17:45AM -0500, Chris Ellington wrote:
> Normally I would agree but after working with CCM5 there are _very_
strict hardware checks so be careful.
>
> My example-
>
> I have an HP DL320G4 with a 3.0G dual core; 72G SATA drives & 2G
RAM.
  I have another server, MCS7825, which is a DL320G4 with a 2.8G
processor, 72G SATA drives and 2G RAM.

In my case it was an IBM x346 in a slightly newer configuration, which
essentially failed on the product part number in the flash.

> Guess which one CCM 5 WILL NOT install on even though the only
difference is a faster processor?  The screen comes back and informs
me
that all is supported except the 3.0G processor.  I would hope that on
the drives and RAM it's a lower bound check and not a strict exact
check
but only Cisco can answer that (or I guess I could if I bought bigger
drives and more ram)

Such checks are rather stupid on an ever changing plattform like the
PC
is
(even when it comes to dedicated server hardware). Certifying
platforms
is
one thing, but insisting on outdated models, BIOS and RAID firmwares
is
just
painful. In my case, the 4.1 installer (2000.2.7) forcibly downgraded
the
machine's BIOS to a version that failed to detect the CPU correctly...

With CCM 5, have a look into the HWTABLE.data file on the DVD. It will
list the exact models that this DVD will support. If you think yours
should
work as well, but fails on some silly detail like part number or
200MHz
clock difference, just add some new lines to this file and rebuild the
DVD.
This works at least with 5.0. For newer versions, Cisco already
threatened
to make the installation cryptographically signed...

-- 
                   The _S_anta _C_laus _O_peration
   or "how to turn a complete illusion into a neverending money
source"

-> Andre Beck    +++ ABP-RIPE +++    IBH Prof. Dr. Horn GmbH, Dresden
<-
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 




More information about the cisco-voip mailing list