[cisco-voip] Remote 7961 Phone at Someone's House -NotesforSetup!
Justin Steinberg
jsteinberg at gmail.com
Thu Oct 26 15:06:44 EDT 2006
Is IP Communicator compatible with phone proxy?
i.e. using communicator without any VPN client.
Justin
On 10/26/06, Louis Marascio (lmarasci) <lmarasci at cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Chase,
>
> This is not something we specifically tested. However, thinking it
> through it /may/ work. You will, of course, still need to VPN from your PC
> for your CTIOS client. PhoneProxy does not build a VPN tunnel, so you can't
> piggy back on it for CTI OS.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Louis
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Casanova, Chase [mailto:ccasanova at rti.org]
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 26, 2006 11:27 AM
> *To:* Louis Marascio (lmarasci); Lelio Fulgenzi; Justin Steinberg; Steve
> Miller
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* RE: [cisco-voip] Remote 7961 Phone at Someone's House
> -NotesforSetup!
>
> Will PhoneProxy work with IPCC CTIOS clients? We are testing the 871,
> 7940, and CTIOS on a laptop from home scenario.
>
>
>
> -Chase
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Louis Marascio
> (lmarasci)
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 26, 2006 12:18 PM
> *To:* Lelio Fulgenzi; Justin Steinberg; Steve Miller
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Remote 7961 Phone at Someone's House
> -NotesforSetup!
>
>
>
> No worries. It is probably partly our fault. We were too busy running
> hard to get integrated and thus orderable that we didn't have much time to
> think about how to present PhoneProxy at CIPTUG. A few of our guys did talk
> about CUAE, but unfortuantely PhoneProxy didn't get any love.
>
>
>
> I'm taking tommorow off, so it is Friday for me. tee hee! :)
>
>
>
> Louis
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca]
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 26, 2006 11:10 AM
> *To:* Louis Marascio (lmarasci); Justin Steinberg; Steve Miller
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Remote 7961 Phone at Someone's House -
> NotesforSetup!
>
> I don't think it's your fault Louis (unless of course you were at CIPTUG!
> ;)......There were plenty of NDA sessions to talk about stuff like this, and
> quite honestly, it's the place to talk about it rather than misdirect people
> to another product. It's hard not to believe that it is intentional
> sometimes.
>
>
>
> But it's almost Friday..... ;)
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "I can eat fifty eggs." "Nobody can eat fifty eggs."
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> *From:* Louis Marascio (lmarasci) <lmarasci at cisco.com>
>
> *To:* Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> ; Justin Steinberg<jsteinberg at gmail.com>; Steve
> Miller <millerman1 at cox.net>
>
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 26, 2006 11:59 AM
>
> *Subject:* RE: [cisco-voip] Remote 7961 Phone at Someone's House -
> NotesforSetup!
>
>
>
> Lelio,
>
>
>
> I'm sorry the messaging got confused after the acquisition. The original
> PhoneProxy product (called SCCP Proxy) that we built at Metreos was based on
> the CUAE. Prior to the acquisition, we at Metreos had started to rebuild
> this product as a standalone appliance. It has taken us some time after the
> acquisition to finish the integration, and thus finish the product. The
> product is indeed going to be available from Cisco, as a standalone
> appliance no longer based on or tied to the CUAE. In fact, it is orderable
> as of today!
>
>
>
> Again, sorry for the confusion.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Louis
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Lelio Fulgenzi
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:47 AM
> *To:* Justin Steinberg; Steve Miller
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Remote 7961 Phone at Someone's House -
> NotesforSetup!
>
> it's so frustrating when you ask about a product you know is there and you
> get told it's no longer available.
>
>
>
> i'm pretty sure this was the Metreos product and i was told the product no
> longer exists and was being replaced by the app engine and you had to write
> it yourself!
>
>
>
> grrrrrrrr
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "I can eat fifty eggs." "Nobody can eat fifty eggs."
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> *From:* Justin Steinberg <jsteinberg at gmail.com>
>
> *To:* Steve Miller <millerman1 at cox.net>
>
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:14 AM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Remote 7961 Phone at Someone's House - Notes
> forSetup!
>
>
>
> If you are planning to deploy a lot of these setups you should ask your SE
> about the phone proxy product.
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps7057/index.html
> <http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps7057/index.html%20>
>
>
> On 10/25/06, *Steve Miller* <millerman1 at cox.net> wrote:
>
> The following is information that I have rec'd regarding the installation
> of a 7961 at someone's house who is using cable or DSL. Is there anything
> else that we might need to think about? Thank you!
>
>
>
> Notes from Cisco Engineer:
>
>
>
> The remote equipment at the home office would consist of a Cisco 871
> router and a Cisco phone with a power block. The Cisco 871 would function
> as the home office's firewall and router (and would connect to either a
> cable modem or a DSL modem depending on the site). The router would be
> configured to have an IPSec tunnel back to the office network (most likely
> configured off of your existing concentrator). The remote Cisco 871 would
> be configured with DHCP and have the TFTP scope option set to tell all
> devices the IP address of the Call Manager server (note the router has a
> built-in four port switch).
>
> At that point, the IP Phone would register normally to the Call Manager
> servers using the IPSec tunnel as it's communication path. The keepalives
> from the phone to the CM servers would keep the IPSec tunnel up and running
> 24/7.
>
> The restrictions on this type of deployment are:
>
> -must use G729 codec due to bandwidth restrictions
>
> -extremely limited QoS control since we are going
> across the Internet
>
> -security policies need to be visited since the
> remote office would have access to the corporate internal network (this one
> is a biggie)
>
> -sub-issue regarding calling from home
> office to home office. This is doable but adds additional security and
> deployment issues.
>
> -need to consider the standard IT management
> overhead associated with supporting home equipment.
>
>
>
> Thank you!
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20061026/f1db247a/attachment-0001.html
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list