[cisco-voip] interac/charge card terminals over VG224

[Ed Leatherman]

We've used VG248 and 224 for these and havent run into any problems. I've
had one work OK on an ATA but I wouldn't go so far as to recommend it.

On 4/4/07, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>
>  I've heard talk about modems and faxes, but I'm wondering if those
> interac/charge card terminals require any special attention.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> ...there's no such thing as a bad timbit...
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>


-- 
Ed Leatherman
Senior Voice Engineer
West Virginia University
Telecommunications and Network Operations
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070404/b3094de5/attachment.html