[cisco-voip] Dial Peer Matching

CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com
Mon Apr 16 12:20:18 EDT 2007


No it doesn't.  You would be fine after that. 

Carlos



"Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca> 
04/16/2007 09:21 AM

To
<CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com>
cc
<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>, <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net>, "john 
Franklin" <john.thevoipguy at gmail.com>
Subject
Re: [cisco-voip] Dial Peer Matching






Does the CCM config not rewrite the dial peers after every time it 
downloads the XML config? Would it not be a losing battle?
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
...there's no such thing as a bad timbit...
----- Original Message ----- 
From: CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com 
To: Lelio Fulgenzi 
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net ; cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net ; john 
Franklin 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Dial Peer Matching


I think you will still have the same problem.  You probably should remove 
your other dial-peers first run the CCM-config and then paste back your 
H.323/SRST dial-peers. 




"Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca> 
Sent by: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net 
04/16/2007 08:36 AM 


To
"john Franklin" <john.thevoipguy at gmail.com>, <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
cc

Subject
Re: [cisco-voip] Dial Peer Matching








I'd like to configure my two FXO ports as MGCP, but this note talks about 
not using CCM config. Can I still use the CCM config statements to control 
the PRIs and then manually configure the FXOs? 
  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
...there's no such thing as a bad timbit... 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: john Franklin 
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 12:45 AM 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Dial Peer Matching 


Steven, yes you are correct... its a stupid bug/feature by design (in my 
opinion) but your H323/SRST dial peers have to be in the config after the 
MGCP dial-peers (doesnt matter what numerical order, just after the mgcp 
peers in a show run). Be carefull not to use CCM config as this places the 
MGCP dial peers in after your existing config. 
 
John


On 4/3/07, STEVEN CASPER <SCASPER at mtb.com> wrote: 
Installed a site tonight with analog FXO trunks controlled via MGCP.
Outbound calls worked fine but inbound did not. Looking at a debug of 
the dial peers I could see that the inbound calls were matching the
dial
peers that were built for SRST. These were in front of the MGCP dial
peers in the router config.

Removed  the SRST dial peers and inbound worked fine. Added them back 
in and inbound still works ok Now they are after the MGCP dial peers
in
the config. Are dial peers searched on a hierarchical basis? I would
have thought that because the FXO ports were controlled by MGCP the 
dial
peers configured for SRST would not have been used.



Thanks!

Steve Casper
Voice Technologies
M&T Bank
(410) 347-6026

************************************
This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information that is 
intended solely for the use of the addressee.  If you are not the intended 
recipient or entity, you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, 
distributing or using any of the information contained in the 
transmission.  If you received this communication in error, please contact 
the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether 
electronic or hard copy.  This communication may contain nonpublic 
personal information about consumers subject to the restrictions of the 
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.  You may not directly 
or indirectly reuse or disclose such information for any purpose other 
than to provide the services for which you are receiving the information. 
There are risks associated with the use of electronic transmission.  The 
sender of this information does not control the method of transmittal or 
service providers and assumes no duty or obligation for the security, 
receipt, or third party interception of this transmission. 
************************************

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070416/8e41d062/attachment.html 


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list