[cisco-voip] CME vs SRST
Lelio Fulgenzi
lelio at uoguelph.ca
Mon Aug 20 18:13:27 EDT 2007
don't forget the limitations in endpoints of CME vs SRST. SRST can scale
quite well.
also, I haven't read much about it b/c of the scaling issue, but it sounded
like you needed a bit more configuration as well. the data sheet said
something about 'one time configuration' as a benefit for SRST.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kalle Tetto" <tettokalle at hotmail.com>
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CME vs SRST
> this is a feature since cme 4.0. and we are using this quite often.
>
> the only problem is to have both configs synchronized, but the good
> thing is cme does not cost more than srst.
>
> Ted Nugent schrieb:
>> Yep, its pretty new
>>
>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps4625/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00807e0566.html
>>
>>
>> --- CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com wrote:
>>
>>> Can CME be used as a fallback from Call Mgr instead
>>> of SRST? I have never
>>> thought so......but a previous admin has a CME
>>> config on a router at a
>>> location that has the following excerpt:
>>>
>>> ephone-hunt 1 sequential
>>> pilot 4700
>>> list 4739, 4740, 4743, 4744
>>> final 9XXXXXXXXXX
>>> preference 3 secondary 7
>>> timeout 16, 16, 16, 16
>>> !
>>> ephone-hunt 2 sequential
>>> pilot 4799
>>> list 4702, 4701
>>> final 9XXXXXXXXXX
>>> timeout 16, 0
>>>
>>> The purpose of this config as explained by the
>>> business was when in "SRST"
>>> (I know this was CME config) to route calls to a
>>> specific DID, hunt
>>> through lines and as a last resort dial outbound to
>>> a telco analog line
>>> with a mailbox to leave a message (important).
>>>
>>> We did SRST testing for all of our locations
>>> locations about 2 months ago
>>> and this particular location did not function at all
>>> with this "CME"
>>> config. I have since converted them to SRST, had an
>>> outage and their
>>> calls did work.
>>>
>>> The business is claiming that this worked at one
>>> time during SRST but I am
>>> skeptical. I am thinking that the previous admin
>>> told him it was
>>> configured but there was no real testing done. Can
>>> anyone shed some light
>>> on this. I need to know:
>>>
>>> 1) Can CME be used instead of SRST?
>>> 2) Can I accomplish what they want via SRST? (see
>>> red above - I think I
>>> can with the alias command but need to check)
>>>
>>>
>>> Below is the full CME config if needed.
>>>
>>>
>>> telephony-service
>>> srst mode auto-provision all
>>> srst dn line-mode dual
>>> max-ephones 100
>>> max-dn 200
>>> ip source-address 10.X.X.X port 2000
>>> max-conferences 8 gain -6
>>> web admin system name X password X
>>> dn-webedit
>>> time-webedit
>>> transfer-system full-consult
>>> !
>>> ephone-dn 1 dual-line
>>> number 4744
>>> description XXXXXXXXXX
>>> name XXXXXXXXXX
>>> !
>>> ephone-dn 2 dual-line
>>> number 4743
>>> description XXXXXXXXXX
>>> name XXXXXXXXXX
>>> !
>>> ephone-dn 3 dual-line
>>> number 4702
>>> description XXXXXXXXXX
>>> name XXXXXXXXXX
>>> !
>>> ephone-dn 4 dual-line
>>> number 4745
>>> description XXXXXXXXXX
>>> name XXXXXXXXXX
>>> !
>>> ephone-dn 5 dual-line
>>> number 4739
>>> description XXXXXXXXXX
>>> name XXXXXXXXXX
>>> !
>>> ephone-dn 6 dual-line
>>> number 4742
>>> description XXXXXXXXXX
>>> name XXXXXXXXXX
>>> !
>>> ephone-dn 7 dual-line
>>> number 4740
>>> description XXXXXXXXXX
>>> name XXXXXXXXXX
>>> !
>>> ephone-dn 8 dual-line
>>> number 5539
>>> description XXXXXXXXXX
>>> name XXXXXXXXXX
>>> !
>>> ephone-dn 9 dual-line
>>> number 4701
>>> description XXXXXXXXXX
>>> name XXXXXXXXXX
>>> !
>>> ephone-dn 10 dual-line
>>> number 4710
>>> description XXXXXXXXXX
>>> name XXXXXXXXXX
>>> !
>>> ephone-dn 11 dual-line
>>> number 1010
>>> description XXXXXXXXXX
>>> name XXXXXXXXXX
>>> !
>>> ephone-dn 12 dual-line
>>> number 4703
>>> description XXXXXXXXXX
>>> name XXXXXXXXXX
>>> !
>>> ephone-dn 13 dual-line
>>> number 1012
>>> description XXXXXXXXXX
>>> name XXXXXXXXXX
>>> !
>>> ephone-dn 14 dual-line
>>> number 4704
>>> description XXXXXXXXXX
>>> name XXXXXXXXXX
>>> !
>>> ephone-dn 15 dual-line
>>> number 4636
>>> description XXXXXXXXXX
>>> name XXXXXXXXXX
>>> !
>>> ephone-dn 16 dual-line
>>> number 4705
>>> description XXXXXXXXXX
>>> name XXXXXXXXXX
>>> !
>>> ephone-dn 17 dual-line
>>> number 4706
>>> description XXXXXXXXXX
>>> name XXXXXXXXXX
>>> !
>>> ephone-dn 18 dual-line
>>> number 4707
>>> description XXXXXXXXXX
>>> name XXXXXXXXXX
>>> !
>>> ephone-dn 19 dual-line
>>> number 7045
>>> description XXXXXXXXXX
>>> name XXXXXXXXXX
>>> !
>>> ephone 1
>>> mac-address 0016.4766.AB7C
>>> button 1:1
>>> !
>>> ephone 2
>>> mac-address 0015.F907.6BE1
>>> !
>>> ephone 3
>>> mac-address 000E.833C.AE08
>>> button 1:3
>>> !
>>> ephone 4
>>> mac-address 0011.5C0E.6108
>>> button 1:4
>>> !
>>> ephone 5
>>> mac-address 0015.F914.1515
>>> !
>>> ephone 6
>>> mac-address 0015.F914.0E19
>>> button 1:6
>>> !
>>> ephone 7
>>> mac-address 0015.F914.11FF
>>> button 1:7 2:15
>>> !
>>> ephone 8
>>> mac-address 0015.F914.0E4C
>>> button 1:9
>>> !
>>> ephone 9
>>> mac-address 00E0.7524.B312
>>> button 1:10
>>> !
>>> ephone 11
>>> mac-address 0015.FA0B.7202
>>> button 1:12
>>> !
>>> ephone 12
>>> mac-address 0017.9486.B302
>>> button 1:14
>>> !
>>>
>> === message truncated ===>
>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________________________________
>> Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's
>> Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when.
>> http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list