[cisco-voip] CME vs SRST

[CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com]

Actually the goal is to keep it simple and provide a couple of functions. 
I think I can do the hunting and forwarding to offisite analog mailbox 
with the alias commands in SRST.   Im going to try that first without 
complicating matters....... 





"Ed Leatherman" <ealeatherman at gmail.com> 
Sent by: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
08/21/2007 09:33 AM

To
"CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com" <CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com>
cc
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net, Kalle Tetto <tettokalle at hotmail.com>
Subject
Re: [cisco-voip] CME vs SRST






Carlos,

AFAIK..
To use the extra features in CME SRST would would have to have them 
provisioned ahead of time in the router config.. ephones, ephone-dns, plus 
your hunt groups etc. So if your goal was to keep the user experience the 
same, you would need to keep the CME configuration up to date with any 
changes you made on call manager. 



On 8/21/07, CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com < 
CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com> wrote:

Lelio -  But it could serve its purpose for smaller offices that need a 
specific functionality. 

Kate - What do you mean keeping the configs synchronized? 

Carlos 


"Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca> 
Sent by: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net 
08/20/200




-- 
Ed Leatherman
Senior Voice Engineer
West Virginia University 
Telecommunications and Network Operations 
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070821/2dcaf3fe/attachment.html