[cisco-voip] 4.2.3sr2b Hunt Pilot rings fast busy
Devin Chamberlain
dchamberlain at unislumin.com
Mon Aug 27 16:19:07 EDT 2007
I have found that in the past with that version of call manager that if
you have another line on the phones that you are trying to get in the
hunt group you will get a fast busy. If that is the case make sure that
there is on only one line on those phones.
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 2:03 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 54, Issue 121
Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. 4.2.3sr2b Hunt Pilot rings fast busy (Jason Aarons (US))
2. Re: Is this Unity's death knell? (Scott Voll)
3. CallManager Express b acd tcl ivr script (Mike Reilly)
4. Im getting a Phone Unprovisioned Error on my 7940 (James Grace)
5. Re: MOH server not registering (Wes Sisk)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:08:05 -0400
From: "Jason Aarons \(US\)" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>
Subject: [cisco-voip] 4.2.3sr2b Hunt Pilot rings fast busy
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
<C1FE15183DA37645BC0633BC604E44F00692A219 at USNAEXCH.na.didata.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I see a Hunt Pilot 3695 pointed to Hunt List, which points to Line Group
with 2 members (8307,8338) in broadcast. Hunt List is reset, shows
good, reset a couple more times for good luck. All CSS have correct
partitions, etc. No shared lines anywhere. No duplicate numbers on Hunt
Pilot or unassigned dns, etc.
I get fast busy dialing Hunt Pilot 3695. I tried changing 3695 to 5555
as we have no numbers beginning with 5....reset Hunt List, still fast
busy...
I've set this up hundreds of times with no problems, maybe a bug with
4.2.3sr2b?
-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070827/04dbc5
8e/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:22:11 -0700
From: "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Is this Unity's death knell?
To: "Steve G" <smgustafson at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco voip list <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
<f84a38d30708271122q756be48ew988c40bf1a2d2f45 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
yes. it does ring your phone if desired. I do have to admit, for once
M$
has done a pretty good job at a first run application. it will also
play
your email, and calandar with out any extra licenses....... Cisco, are
you
paying attention?
Scott
On 8/27/07, Steve G <smgustafson at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> With Exchange 2007, does it allow you to listen to your VM through the
> phone? Like with Unity ViewMail you can click play and it will ring
your
> extension which will then play your message to you after you pick-up.
>
> On 8/27/07, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I am sure someone will come out with a freeware app that does MWI...
> >
> > However, it probably won't be able to tag just voicemails and will
> > light MWI on all inbox items.
> >
> > The reality is that, in a unified messaging environment, most people
> > don't use their phones to retrieve vmail anyway.
> >
> > I think a business argument could almost be made to forgo MWI and
> > issue everyone speakers for their PCs.
> >
> >
> >
> > J
> >
> > On 8/27/07, Jeffrey C. Ollie <jeff at ocjtech.us> wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2007-08-26 at 23:17 -0500, Jonathan Charles wrote:
> > > >
> >
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/features/unifiedmessaging.m
spx
> > > >
> > > > Speech-Enabled Auto Attendant
> > > >
> > > > The Attendant answers calls using an automated operator with
> > > > customizable menus (for example, "press 1 for sales") and global
> > > > address list directory lookups (for example, "who would you like
to
> > > > contact?"). Callers can interact with the Automated Attendant
> > through
> > > > touchtone menus or their voice using speech recognition.
> > > >
> > > > I think the integrated speed recognition is pretty cool, and as
soon
> >
> > > > as you play with Outlook Voice Access, Unity looks kind of sad
in
> > > > comparison...
> > >
> > > The "cool" features may be nice to give to your "C" level users,
but
> > the
> > > killer for me would be letting the in-house Exchange admins handle
the
> >
> > > voicemail/auto-attendants on their (existing) highly-available
> > Exchange
> > > clusters, rather than depending on my single Unity server. That
way I
> > > can also stop being an Exchange administrator myself (which I have
> > > neither the training or temperament for).
> > >
> > > One thing I noticed from [1]:
> > > Exchange 2007 Unified Messaging has been tested for use
with
> > > Cisco Call Manager version 5.x. If you have Cisco Call
Manager
> >
> > > 5.x on your network, you will be able to connect Exchange
2007
> > > Unified Messaging servers directly to Call Manager without
the
> > > requirement of an IP/VoIP gateway. Many of the features
that
> > are
> > > included with Exchange 2007 Unified Messaging are fully
> > > functional with Cisco Call Manager 5.x. However, the
Message
> > > Waiting Indicator (MWI) feature does not work and faxing
does
> > > not work because the T.38 faxing protocol is not supported
by
> > > Cisco Call Manager.
> > >
> > > T.38 faxing I think I could do without, but I think I'd be in
danger
> > of
> > > losing my job if MWI stopped working. However, according to the
> > > document that you can download from [2] there's a third-party
> > > solution[3] that enables MWI.
> > >
> > > [1]
> >
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/2516dac1-dfdc-47eb-8e6f-18b15
37a57b2.aspx
> > > [2]
> >
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=68b43d3c-7c84-4
c2f-bfd7-98754970d70e&displaylang=en
> > > [3] http://www.mwi2007.com/
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-voip mailing list
> > > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070827/95cdbd
d7/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:41:56 -0400
From: Mike Reilly <reillyipt at gmail.com>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CallManager Express b acd tcl ivr script
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <C2F89334.4AF%reillyipt at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
I am trying to do something different with the CME B ACD tcl script.
Call
comes into main line 555-1212 rings several phones, no answer or busy
forward to a number 1880. Set up a dial peer
Dial-peer voice 1881 voip
Service aa
Destination-pattern 1880
Session target ipv4:10.100.100.1
Incoming called-number 1880
Dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
Codec g711ulaw
No vad
The above dial peer will trigger the b acd application. Does anyone
know if
this will work? Remember the 1880 is going to be a forward destination
under the dn.
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:43:36 -0400
From: "James Grace" <jgrace at adcapnet.com>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Im getting a Phone Unprovisioned Error on my
7940
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
<ECEA9223F645834FB6A65B7CE377B9CD11C756 at mail.adcapnetsvc.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
?
can someone tell me why im getting the below error
Im getting a Phone Unprovisioned Error on my 7940
James Grace
Systems Engineer
Adcap Network Systems, Inc.
6865 Shiloh Road East, Suite 250
Alpharetta, GA 30005
office: 678-456-6986
direct: 678-456-6761
jgrace at adcapnet.com
www.adcapnet.com <http://www.adcapnet.com/>
Disclaimer For ADCAP Network Systems
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review,
retransmission, dissemination or other use of,
or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or
entities other than the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you received this message in error, please
contact the sender and delete the
material from all computers."
This original email was sent to the internet for delivery at 27 Aug 2007
14:42:46 -0400
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070827/2918e8
47/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:02:18 -0400
From: Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] MOH server not registering
To: Louis Koekemoer ((ZA)) <Louis.Koekemoer at za.didata.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <05A02FA4-DCDA-49DB-AE02-22D57ABF3406 at cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
In the service parameters for IPVMSApp make sure the run flag for MoH
is set true. After that, do you see a registration error in the
event viewer logs or CM traces? what device pool is configured for
the MoH server? Are the CM servers in that device pool/cm group online?
/Wes
On Aug 27, 2007, at 9:25 AM, Louis Koekemoer ((ZA)) wrote:
I have a customer that has CallManager 3.3. They are planning new
equipment and an upgrade, but only late this year or possible early
next year. Their current problem is that their software Music-on-hold
server does not register. I have even deleted and recreate it with
the exact same name, but nothing. I have tried to stop and start the
?Cisco IP Voice Media Streaming App? under services which should
automatically create this. No success. Customer is rebooting server
tonight to see if we get any further.
Anyone with any ideas?
Kind Regards
Louis Koekemoer
Cisco IPT Systems Engineer
Dimension Data South Africa
( +27 11 575 6560
) +27 76 608 7221
* louis.koekemoer at za.didata.com
This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer.htm"
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070827/97d15b
e8/attachment.html
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 54, Issue 121
*******************************************
Attention:
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. Disclosure to any person other than the named recipient is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete all copies of this information and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of UNIS LUMIN Inc. shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. UNIS LUMIN Inc. and any of its subsidiaries reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Thank you.
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list