[cisco-voip] 91 possibly calling 911?

[Leetun, Rob]

I understand your point of view.  However, when there are over 150 '911'
and '9.911' miss-dials a month.  A few seconds of waiting should not be
that big of deal unless you live in Illinois as Jonathan noted.  My
state does not required any urgent setting on the 911 and 9.911 route
patterns.


Rob

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matthew Saskin
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 8:51 PM
To: Jonathan Charles
Cc: ciscovoip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 91 possibly calling 911?

Urgent priority or not, 911 and 9.911 should always be distinct matches 
and not have to wait for the t.302 timer to expire.

NPA's start with 2-9, and international calls start with 011, there 
shouldn't be anything (unless you have DN's starting with 911 or 9911) 
to be an alternate match...

-matt

Jonathan Charles wrote:
> Unless you live in Illinois where 911 must be an urgent priority
pattern....
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Dec 18, 2007 12:32 PM, Craig Staffin <cmstaffin at gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> hey Rob thats an interesting concept
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 18, 2007 11:51 AM, Leetun, Rob <rleetun at co.boulder.co.us>
wrote:
>>     
>>> How about changing the route pattern to 911? and 9.911?; then this
would
>>> give the caller enough time to hang up the phone based on the t.302
>>> timer?
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>>> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jonathan
>>> Charles
>>> Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 3:07 PM
>>> To: Scott Voll
>>> Cc: ciscovoip
>>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 91 possibly calling 911?
>>>
>>> Change your access code to 8...
>>>
>>> We recommend it, but mostly because CM routes calls so much faster
>>> than older PBXs do...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> J
>>>
>>> On Dec 16, 2007 4:04 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>       
>>>> only asking because the last PBX did that so people are blaming the
>>>> accidental 911 calls on the CM now.
>>>>
>>>> Scott
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 14, 2007 3:47 PM, Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> 91 would definitely not match 911, not enough chars.  the only way
>>>>>           
>>> you
>>>       
>>>> could timeout and match the pattern would be pattern 91? as ?
matches
>>>>         
>>> zero
>>>       
>>>> or more chars.
>>>>         
>>>>> /Wes
>>>>>
>>>>> Scott Voll wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it possible if someone dials 91 and pauses long enough would it
>>>>>           
>>> auto
>>>       
>>>> dial 911?  I think I might have 911 set to emergency priority or
what
>>>>         
>>> every
>>>       
>>>> it's called.
>>>>         
>>>>> CM 5.1
>>>>>
>>>>> Scott________________________________
>>>>>           
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>       
>>
>> --
>> Craig Staffin
>> Craig at staffin.org
>> (H) 262-437-7313
>> (C) 262-613-6003
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>   

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip