[cisco-voip] Unity 4.2.1 migration - onbox -> offbox

Jonathan Charles jonvoip at gmail.com
Sun Dec 23 17:23:39 EST 2007


What you would need to do is backup the PSTs and recreate the user
inboxes.. and migrate the PSTs back into Exchange... it would be ugly
and you would lose your call handlers...

I guess, in theory, you could just add a UM license to a VM Unity and
then demote the Unity server (from a DC) and then join it to the
domain, move the PSTs over to the corp Exchange... but I wouldn't want
to try it.



Jonathan

On Dec 20, 2007 10:21 AM,  <Thorsten.Mayr at barclayscapital.com> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Anybody ever come across issues when migrating from a one box standalone
> AD/DC/Exchange/Unity system over to an offbox "proper AD" environment?
>
> I have had issues in a way that the whole system broke even though the
> install before the DIRT restore was successful.
> Taken it up with TAC and spoken to DE's but getting mixed answers and
> messages - the logging level wasn't high enough to give a proper
> resolution. One of the main issues were that AD accounts got created but
> no mailboxes.
> Various table entries in the UnityDB were empty or referencing the old
> mailboxstoreobjectID missing alias - no directoryID - wrong
> logonserver....  In the subscriber table as well as in the mailbox store
> table..
> Just to name a few errors...
>
>
> Just performed it in a test lab and worked a treat even though we
> followed the exact same procedure...
>
> Any ideas - anybody?
>
> Callmanager 5.1.2.2102-1 and Unity 4.2(1) - all servers H2's 7845's
> Latest releases of DIRT and DBWalker.
>
> And on a different note, I had issues with the standalone box regarding
> the HP Teaming tool. It's an H1 45 as well. It broke and can't use the
> teaming tool any more... Tried reinstalling the latest releases...
> Again taken up with TAC/HTTS ...
>
> If anybody has details on how the relationship between the various AD
> objects that are being pushed/pulled related to the SQL entries - would
> be a start, recon this is deep cisco internal's though...
>
> Thanks
> T
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> For important statutory and regulatory disclosures and more information about Barclays Capital, please visit our web site at http://www.barcap.com.
>
> Internet communications are not secure and therefore the Barclays Group does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.  Although the Barclays Group operates anti-virus programmes, it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed.  Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Barclays Group.  Replies to this email may be monitored by the Barclays Group for operational or business reasons.
>
> Barclays Capital is the investment banking division of Barclays Bank PLC, a company registered in England (number 1026167) with its registered office at 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP. This email may relate to or be sent from other members of the Barclays Group.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list