[cisco-voip] List of MCS hardware equivalents for CallManager 5

[Ryan Ratliff]

A severity 6 bug is the equivalent of a feature request.  The fact  
that there's a bug means that the push came from TAC.  The account  
teams have their own way of submitting feature requests which have a  
much greater chance of getting implemented than than sev 6 bugs TAC  
files.

-Ryan

On Jan 3, 2007, at 10:07 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:

feature request? Cisco has it listed as a bug. status 'new' since 2004

http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/Bugtool/onebug.pl?bugid=CSCdr03425


------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
--------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"I can eat fifty eggs." "Nobody can eat fifty eggs."
----- Original Message -----
From: Philip Walenta
To: 'Lelio Fulgenzi' ; 'Simon, Bill' ; 'Voll, Scott'
Cc: 'cisco-voip at puck-nether.net'
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 9:52 AM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] List of MCS hardware equivalents for  
CallManager 5

I had a few customers put in a feature request for CFA on any line,  
and hold ringback about 6.5 years ago.

We finally got hold ringback in CCM4.2.

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip- 
bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 3:46 PM
To: Simon, Bill; Voll, Scott
Cc: cisco-voip at puck-nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] List of MCS hardware equivalents for  
CallManager 5

The feature should be available on the phone itself, with out the  
need to have a PC and assign devices to userIDs and have userIDs and  
passwords. Like I'm gonna install a PC in our steam tunnels. ;)

The phone itself has to be programmed for the idea/concept of  
forwarding secondary lines. Right now if you forward a line, there is  
no indication WHATSOEVER (kaboom goes Lelio's head) to say that that  
line is forwarded. This limits XML applications as well. They try to  
change the line text label, but if people have already changed it, it  
starts screwing things up. For example, the little dancing phone and  
arrow should be applied at the line level, not at the top of the  
phone. Using the blue scroll bar would cycle through the forwarding  
destinations on the screen.

</rant>
------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
--------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"I can eat fifty eggs." "Nobody can eat fifty eggs."
----- Original Message -----
From: Simon, Bill
To: Voll, Scott
Cc: cisco-voip at puck-nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] List of MCS hardware equivalents for  
CallManager 5

You mean you can't CFA a secondary line?  What if you do it from the
CCMUser web interface?

/not at my desk so can't try it

Voll, Scott wrote:

 > It’s one of those things that you just aren’t going to win…. You know
 > like call forwarding a second line(right Lelio?). or all IPT using  
the
 > same version of Java(I’m talking to myself).
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip