[cisco-voip] 512+512 char limit for calling searchspace+ CallManager 5.x

Lelio Fulgenzi lelio at uoguelph.ca
Wed Jan 24 09:23:34 EST 2007


Strange they didn't update the docs. :(

Thanks Matt.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
I'm changing my name to iPhone. Who do I pay trademark rights to?

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Matt Slaga (US) 
  To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; Robert Singleton ; Voip List 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 10:37 PM
  Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] 512+512 char limit for calling searchspace+ CallManager 5.x


  I asked this question specifically to the BU regarding Route Filter 1024 limits.  I was told that this was fixed in CallManager 5.0 and I have tested it to be accurate.  This problem was directly related to a SQL limitation.

  I have not tested the 1024 limit for CSS partition members.

  The 1024 limit does not apply to phones because CallManager makes the decisions on both Route Filters and CSS partition members, it does not send the list to be parsed by the phone.





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
  Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 5:35 PM
  To: Robert Singleton; Voip List
  Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 512+512 char limit for calling searchspace+ CallManager 5.x


  wow, i pretty much remember someone pointing out the SQL issue myself. i'm not sure how a phone has anything to do with it's callingsearchspace and why it would store it locally, all that processing is done on the callmanager.

  from what i gather, as someone also alluded to, the SQL table supports 1024 characters. if you look at the database, the callingsearchspace table has a clause column which is 1024 characters and is not concatenated in any way.

  i wonder if there is some sort of SQL operation going on in realtime that then hits this 1024 character when it does concatenate things.



  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
  Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
  (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
  I'm changing my name to iPhone. Who do I pay trademark rights to?

    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Robert Singleton 
    To: Voip List 
    Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 5:14 PM
    Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 512+512 char limit for calling search space+ CallManager 5.x


    On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 12:26 -0500, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
    > Does anyone know if the 512+512 character limit for a calling search
    > space was modified in CallManager 5.x? This was based on some SQL
    > issue I believe as it expanded the calling search space out to the
    > actual names of the partitions.

    A TAC engineer once told me that the base source of this limitation was
    because RAM allocation limitations in the telephones themselves was only
    1024 bytes.

    I must admit that it seems a bit unlikely that every model of Cisco
    telephone, some of which were originally designed and manufactured by
    different companies, would suffer the exact same limitation. Maybe it's
    a lowest common denominator thing...

    Robert

    _______________________________________________
    cisco-voip mailing list
    cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
    https://puck..nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070124/55fd9876/attachment.html 


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list