[cisco-voip] shared line as primary line

[VM]

Lelio,

Did Cisco explain why they are suggesting not to share the primary  
lines?

I have shared many primary lines and my only thought for not sharing  
the primary lines is for proper Emergency Response, i.e. E911.   
Although, CER can distinguish calls from different Emergency Response  
Locations and the Emergency Responders can be directed to the correct  
location of the caller (assuming all configurations are correct), if  
a return call to the shared numbered is answered by someone other  
than the original caller, incorrect and/or confusing information  
might be told the Emergency Response caller.

VM

On Jul 26, 2007, at 11:59 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:

> I've heard people from Cisco say not to do this, has anyone found  
> out a bad thing about shared lines as primary lines on more than  
> one phone?
>
> Lelio
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ----------
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo  
> buffalo."      WJR
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070726/8d98fd57/attachment.html