[cisco-voip] Auto-QoS ?
Jonathan Charles
jonvoip at gmail.com
Tue Jun 5 16:10:01 EDT 2007
I would agree on the Router-side.. but for the switches, it is far
more likely to have positive results than the manual method...
especially without years of experience configuring your queues...
To be honest, the auto-qos dumps config into the switch that is, A:
Cisco TAC supported, B: Likely to work great and C: easy.
Why wouldn't you use it? Unless you have a lot of SNA traffic or something...
Jonathan
On 6/5/07, Paul Choi <asobihoudai at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Auto-QoS, better known as "QoS for idiots" (like
> myself) is a cookie cutter approach to your network. I
> think it's better not to use if you have the knowhow
> to implement QoS yourself.
>
> --- "Christopher M. Bomba" <cbomba at s4nets.com> wrote:
>
> > I have implemented QoS on multiple voice networks
> > from 6500s to 2950s. I have done it always
> > manually. The network I am working on now is
> > insisting on Auto-QoS. I haven't done it before but
> > only heard horror stories from it.
> >
> > What are you thoughts on this? This is a very large
> > network that is going to have multiple clusters and
> > thousands of devices connected to the IPT network.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Be a PS3 game guru.
> Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.
> http://videogames.yahoo.com/platform?platform=120121
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list