[cisco-voip] does anyone see seperate long distance trunks any more?
Ed Leatherman
ealeatherman at gmail.com
Fri Jun 8 11:11:07 EDT 2007
I did this also when we first installed callmanager for the same reason.
Currently we use the same PRI's for both, but once we are completely off of
our centrex service in another year or so, we'll likely have separate trunks
for LD.
On 6/8/07, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>
> I'm doing some redesign of my dial-plan and have sorted my route groups
> into local and long distance, however, they contain the same trunks.
>
> This was done on the off chance we would purchase local and long distance
> service from seperate providers.
>
> However, with the age of digital (and even analog I would assume), if I
> were to purchase my long distance service from another provider, would they
> simply not 'pic' the long distance from my local service provider,
> eliminating the need for seperate trunks?
>
> I guess I'm just wondering if I need to do this level of seperation any
> more?
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo."
> WJR
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
--
Ed Leatherman
Senior Voice Engineer
West Virginia University
Telecommunications and Network Operations
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070608/315c4fd2/attachment.html
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list