[cisco-voip] CME 4.1 vs. CM 4.1.3 and Unity Express 2.3 vs. Unity 4.2(1)

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

have you considered the small business edition?

it has zero upgrade path, but if it's a small office it might do what you need.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
"Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo."      WJR

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Robert Kulagowski 
  To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
  Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 5:14 PM
  Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CME 4.1 vs. CM 4.1.3 and Unity Express 2.3 vs. Unity 4.2(1)


  keli at carocomp.ro wrote:
  > How about size and scalability?
  > Ease of management?

  Well, this is for Johannesburg, and our centralized CM's are in the U.S. 
  and London, so latency would kill us.  That's why we're considering 
  either local CM or CME.
  _______________________________________________
  cisco-voip mailing list
  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070612/463fd035/attachment.html