[cisco-voip] Cisco 7920 wireless phones not taking with
May, Simon
Simon.May at ihs.com
Wed Jun 13 07:33:43 EDT 2007
Probably a stupid question, but is the DHCP server on the same Vlan as
the phone ... if not add a ip helper-address to the vlan interface to
point to the DHCP server.
Simon
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
Sent: 13 June 2007 11:23
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 52, Issue 96
Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: CCM 3.3 + 2003 AD integration (Ranjan Babu .G)
2. Re: Cisco 7920 wireless phones not taking with dhcpserver.
(Ahmed Elnagar)
3. Re: getting dial-tone when dialing into FXO port whilein SRST
mode (Ahmed Elnagar)
4. AXL help - Translation patterns (Johnny Crothers)
5. Re: E1 unbalanced cable for MFT interface? (David Sullivan)
6. Re: AXL help - Translation patterns (Alexander Wolf)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:26:28 +0530
From: "Ranjan Babu .G" <ranjan.ganesh at gavsin.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM 3.3 + 2003 AD integration
To: "Ryan Ratliff" <rratliff at cisco.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <6A808E3BD461C94DACA49D21E46E30BC01652E2D at mail.gavsin.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250"
Hi Ryan,
Thanks for more information.
Cross check CCM version .It is 3.3 (4) Sr2 and found document is Cisco
site for 3.3 (3) and 3.3 (4) caveats (CSCeb09099) that were resolved.
Thanks and Regards,
Ranjan
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Ratliff [mailto:rratliff at cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 9:15 PM
To: Ranjan Babu .G
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM 3.3 + 2003 AD integration
Definitely make sure you have the fix for CSCeb09099 - AD2003:
Upgrade to AD2003 fails because of incorrect labeledURI OID. It
caused a lot of headaches back in the day.
You also need to be aware of the new referrals introduced by AD 2003
when your search base is the root of the domain. If your DNS is set
up incorrectly or you have DCs over an unstable WAN (or just one with
high delay) from CM you will want to use the CM server's hosts file
to control which DCs it uses to contact forestdnszones,
domaindnszones, and your domain root (ie cisco.com).
-Ryan
On Jun 12, 2007, at 6:27 AM, Ranjan Babu .G wrote:
Hi,
We have CCM 3.3 integrated with Microsoft Active Directory (AD)
2000.Now we are in the process of upgrade 2000 AD to 2003 AD.
Any impact will be there .Any work around there to resolve the same.
Regards,
Ranjan
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.13/844 - Release Date:
11/06/2007 5:10 PM
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.13/844 - Release Date:
11/06/2007 5:10 PM
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.15/847 - Release Date:
12/06/2007 9:42 PM
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:47:29 +0300
From: "Ahmed Elnagar" <aelnagar at ACT-EG.COM>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco 7920 wireless phones not taking with
dhcpserver.
To: "Paul Choi" <asobihoudai at yahoo.com>, <eduardo at alumni.calpoly.edu>,
<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <88C8D019DA547C4BABECB9A806ED22EDE6A438 at mail.ACT-EG.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
What is the series of the switch that this AP is connected to, what is
the configuration under the port connected to the AP ??
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Paul Choi
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 7:18 AM
To: eduardo at alumni.calpoly.edu; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco 7920 wireless phones not taking with
dhcpserver.
--- Eduardo Castro <eduardo at alumni.calpoly.edu> wrote:
> Thanks for replying.
>
> I reset the phone manually, and reconfigured it
> with an static IP. The
> phone still will not register with the callmanager
> 4.1
>
> I ran the following debugs
> debug dot11 mgmt msg
> debug dot11 mgmt ssid
> debug dot11 mgmt state-machine
> debug dot11 mgmt station
>
> the debugs only show the phones tha are working and
> have a mac address. But
> a few of the other not working phones do not show in
> the debug, yet on the
> phone it says 'Authentication ok'
>
> it looks like the phones are authenticating fine to
> the AP
> But I still can't figure out how come they are not
> getting a dhcp server ip
> address.
>
> It may be a wired issue or the actual dhcp server.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/phones/ps379/products_administrat
ion_guide_chapter09186a008047f9b0.html
Have you reset the phones to factory default?
________________________________________________________________________
____________
Bored stiff? Loosen up...
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
http://games.yahoo.com/games/front
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:56:53 +0300
From: "Ahmed Elnagar" <aelnagar at ACT-EG.COM>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] getting dial-tone when dialing into FXO port
whilein SRST mode
To: "Paul Choi" <asobihoudai at yahoo.com>, <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <88C8D019DA547C4BABECB9A806ED22EDE6A44A at mail.ACT-EG.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hello;
When dialing into the FXO port and then u got a dial tone then u r
hitting the hidden dial-peer 0 which gives u that tone this means that
ur call doesnot match any configured dial-peer, if u r running MGCP on
this FXO port then u will do ur configuration from callmanager as the DN
of this line this is equivalent to the connection plar opx in the H323
mode. In h323 mode and using the connection plar opx u need to make a
dial-peer for the router to when how to go to the extension u define in
the command connection plar opx, the command itself tell the router to
lookup its dialing plan to go to a specific extension, so still there
will be a need to a dial-peer to inform the router where to go.
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Paul Choi
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 3:37 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] getting dial-tone when dialing into FXO port
whilein SRST mode
That is correct, AFAIK, you don't need dial peers for
the FXO ports unless you're planning on sending calls
out them.
Paul
--- Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
> OK - Thanks. I wasn't sure about that. I was going
> to (and have) tested reloads to see if that command
> sticks and it looks like it does.
>
> For a minute it looked liked it added the MGCP
> dialpeers at the end of the config but it looks like
> I didn't save the previous reorder.
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but unless I want to send
> calls out these FXO ports, I don't need a dial-peer
> at all do I?
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph *
> Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo
> Buffalo buffalo." WJR
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Erick Bergquist
> To: Lelio Fulgenzi
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 6:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] getting dial-tone when
> dialing into FXO port while in SRST mode
>
>
> The connection plar command is what you need with
> FXOs in H.323 (SRST)
> mode. The MGCP config push won't remove it.
>
> On 6/12/07, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Ok, I know this is simple, but I can't find the
> solution. Or at least what I
> > think I need.
> >
> > While in SRST mode, when I dial into the FXO
> port I get dial-tone. I need it
> > to go to a particular number. In my readings, I
> see that you can configure
> > "connection plar" on the voice port, but from
> what I gather I'm not supposed
> > to add config statements to the voice port when
> I'm using "ccm-manager
> > config".
> >
> > I reordered my dial-peers so the 999020 is at
> the top and my 20 is after it.
> > I thought I could add the "incoming called
> number" like I did on the PRIs,
> > but no go. I was thinking I just needed to
> configure the dial-peer voice 20
> > to modify the inbound calling number to match my
> extension.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > !
> > dial-peer voice 999020 pots
> > service mgcpapp
> > port 0/2/0
> > !
> > dial-peer voice 20 pots
> > incoming called-number 61001
> > port 0/2/0
> > !
> >
> >
> >
> > When I dial in I get
> >
> > .Jun 12 18:10:25: %CALL_CONTROL-6-APP_NOT_FOUND:
> Application mgcpapp in
> > dial-peer 999020 not found. Handing callid 11
> to the alternate app Default.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
> > Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> > Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph *
> Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> > (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> >
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo
> Buffalo buffalo." WJR
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
________________________________________________________________________
____________
Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell.
http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:44:53 +0100
From: "Johnny Crothers" <Johnny.Crothers at vanco.co.uk>
Subject: [cisco-voip] AXL help - Translation patterns
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
<A56BD242744BF540B15D1672E0E3E8750131D4EB at LON-INT-MSGVS01.internal.vanco
corp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hey everyone,
I'm wanting to start looking at AXL, mainly because I have to input 140
translations... all different :-)
Anyone got anything they can point me at? Or maybe something I could
use? Very new to AXL and havnt spent much time as of yet to learn it.
Thanks!!
Johnny
**********************************************************************
Any opinions expressed in the email are those of the individual and not
necessarily the company. This email and any files transmitted with it
are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for
delivering it to the intended recipient, be advised that you have
received this email in error and that any dissemination, distribution,
copying or use is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this email in error, or if you are concerned with
the content of this email please e-mail to:
e-security.support at vanco.info
The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software
viruses which could damage your own computer system. While the sender
has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we cannot
accept liability for any damage which you sustain as a result of
software viruses. You should carry out your own virus checks before
opening any attachments to this e-mail.
Vanco UK Ltd Registered in England No: 2296733 Registered Office: John
Busch House, 277 London Road, Isleworth, Middlesex TW7 5AX
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
**********************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070613/2b6f3c
dd/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:08:37 +0100
From: "David Sullivan" <David.Sullivan at barnet.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] E1 unbalanced cable for MFT interface?
To: "Jason Aarons (US)" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>, "Vince
Loschiavo" <VLoschiavo at data-corporation.com>,
<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
<EDB47A2F10617E4095AE70CBBC723F611E2F24 at oak.bc-ad.barnet.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net wrote:
> I was hoping to find a manufactured cable, I don't think my
> local vendor does very many foreign E1 assemblies..he'd probably get
> it wrong....
I've not seen pre-manufactured cables like that, the way we've converted
our G.703 terminated ISDN lines to UTP is using baluns like
http://shrunk.net/6b4dec2d-www.blackbox.co.uk (search for G.703 balun if
the URL breaks)
They can also supply the BNC cables and the UTP side is just a UTP patch
lead. If you shop around you can probably find them a bit cheaper from
somewhere else but those will definitely do what you need.
David.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
This communication may contain privileged or confidential information
which
is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you are not the
intended recipient, please note that you may not distribute or use this
communication or the information it contains. If this e-mail has
reached you
in error, please delete it and any attachment.
Internet communications are not secure and Barnet College does not
accept
legal responsibility for the content of this message. Any views or
opinions
expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of Barnet
College.
Please note that Barnet college reserves the right to monitor the
source/destinations of all incoming or outgoing e-mail communications.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:49:56 +0200
From: "Alexander Wolf" <Alexander.Wolf at world-direct.at>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] AXL help - Translation patterns
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <29E7A2E61B0FCC488E78EDA3E79313AB01DC1E0A at www>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi !
If you can use a .NET library with all proxy classes for AXL, I can
unicast it to you.
I posted it a while ago on the list. It is tested with 4.1, but should
work with 4.2, too.
Not sure with 5.X, never tested it.
Let me know if you need it,
Alex
Von: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] Im Auftrag von Johnny
Crothers
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2007 10:45
An: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Betreff: [cisco-voip] AXL help - Translation patterns
Hey everyone,
I'm wanting to start looking at AXL, mainly because I have to input 140
translations... all different J
Anyone got anything they can point me at? Or maybe something I could
use? Very new to AXL and havnt spent much time as of yet to learn it.
Thanks!!
Johnny
**********************************************************************
Any opinions expressed in the email are those of the individual and not
necessarily the company. This email and any files transmitted with it
are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for
delivering it to the intended recipient, be advised that you have
received this email in error and that any dissemination, distribution,
copying or use is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this email in error, or if you are concerned with
the content of this email please e-mail to:
e-security.support at vanco.info
The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software
viruses which could damage your own computer system. While the sender
has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we cannot
accept liability for any damage which you sustain as a result of
software viruses. You should carry out your own virus checks before
opening any attachments to this e-mail.
Vanco UK Ltd Registered in England No: 2296733 Registered Office: John
Busch House, 277 London Road, Isleworth, Middlesex TW7 5AX
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
**********************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070613/590c18
be/attachment.html
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 52, Issue 96
******************************************
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list