[cisco-voip] SIP disposition after 488 to T.38
Fedorov, Konstantin
kfedor at amt.ru
Fri Jun 29 06:52:15 EDT 2007
Hi Roy,
Ok, I understand.
I think its depends, which method of fax sending you use.
1/ If fax machine auto answer call, then after no more sip messages can
be.
2/ If before fax sending you open voice stream, I mean you talk with
person
Which must receive fax, then after fail attempt its possible to send
again re-invite.
-----------------------
Sincerely Yours,
Konstantin Fedorov
-----Original Message-----
From: roy [mailto:bandwidth.user at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 6:55 AM
To: Fedorov, Konstantin
Cc: cisco-voip
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] SIP disposition after 488 to T.38
Hi Konstantin,
When a call from the sip box hits an IVR/fax, the cisco box detects the
SIT and tries to negotiate t38. 488 has been sent since the SIP box has
disabled t38. There would have been a fall-back if g711 is available,
but, due to some constraints, 711 isn't available. Hope I'm not missing
something here.
Thanks,
Roy
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 18:20 +0400, Fedorov, Konstantin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you provide full capture of SIP signaling.
> Because now its difficult to say what is the reason jf 488 message.
>
> 488 message mean - Not applicable here. So SIP box doesn't like
> re-invite
>
> -----------------------
> Sincerely Yours,
> Konstantin Fedorov
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of roy
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 8:36 AM
> To: cisco-voip
> Subject: [cisco-voip] SIP disposition after 488 to T.38
>
> Hi List,
>
> Here's a setup and packet capture flow:
>
> SIP box Cisco
> [a at b.com] [x at y.com]
> INVITE x at y.com --------->
> <--------- 100 TRYING
> <--------- 183 Session Progress
> <--------- 200 OK
> ACK x at y.com --------->
> <--------- re-INVITE a at b.com to t.38
> 488 --------->
> <--------- ACK
> ...
> ...
>
> Given that only available codec of g.729 at Asterisk side, what
messages
> are to be expected after the T.38 re-invite has been made and was
> rejected with 488?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Roy
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list