[cisco-voip] Bandwidth Sync Issues
Lelio Fulgenzi
lelio at uoguelph.ca
Tue Mar 13 14:43:23 EST 2007
So should I stay away from locations where possible? We have a remote site coming online with a large pipe (100Mbps) and I wanted to use locations. It sounds like there are definately some bugs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
...there's no such thing as a bad timbit...
----- Original Message -----
From: Patrick Diener
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Bandwidth Sync Issues
unfortunatly that sounds like a ccm bug to me...
On 3/13/07, Andrew F. Wolfe <deadpool.slayer.telecomm at gmail.com> wrote:
> Calls are properly released. Essentially when the calls come in and are
> released it looks like the bandwidth that was originally allocated is not
> released. Eventually the bandwidth usage climbs to a point that there are
> no more resources
>
>
> On 3/13/07, Patrick Diener <patrick.diener at gmail.com> wrote:
> > you said "calls will drop and that bandwidth does not release", what
> > does drop mean exactly? Are calls properly released or do they
> > actually drop in the middle of conversations?
> >
> >
> > On 3/13/07, Andrew F. Wolfe <
> deadpool.slayer.telecomm at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > That is pretty much the same issue, unfortunately resynch of the
> bandwidth
> > > is only temporary. It lasts about 45 minutes then starts to climb up
> again.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 3/13/07, Jason Aarons (US) <jason.aarons at us.didata.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I've given up on Locations in CCM 4.1 being error free. Seems to have
> some
> > > caveats requiring re-syncs here and there.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I had a hub/spoke site with T1 1.54MBps and 3 7940s. Locations was set
> to
> > > 384k. Codec was G729a. After a couple months no issues, the third
> phone
> > > would call across the WAN and get "Not Enough Bandwidth", then I saw
> this at
> > > other customers randomly. Once we re-synch the issue went away.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > > [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf
> Of
> > > Matt Slaga (US)
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 2:57 PM
> > > > To: Andrew F. Wolfe; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > > > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Bandwidth Sync Issues
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What version of CCM are you running? I've seen this before..
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> > > cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Andrew
> F.
> > > Wolfe
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 1:49 PM
> > > > To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > > > Subject: [cisco-voip] Bandwidth Sync Issues
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I have an H.323 gateway at an SRST site that is having bandwidth
> > > synchronization issues. When you watch a perfmon of the calls using the
> > > Cisco Locations Performance Object, you see that the bandwidth seems
> fine
> > > but then calls will drop and that bandwidth does not release. When you
> > > manually resync the bandwidth everything is corrected but within about
> 30
> > > minutes the bandwidth climbs higher and higher until out of resources.
> At
> > > the other 53 locations we don't have this issue. Any thoughts? What do
> you
> > > need to know from me? Thanks in advance.
> > > > ________________________________
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> > > confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
> > > addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
> you
> > > are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error
> and
> > > that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly
> > > prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication
> in
> > > error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and
> deleting
> > > it from your computer. Thank you.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> > > confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
> > > addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
> you
> > > are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error
> and
> > > that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly
> > > prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication
> in
> > > error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and
> deleting
> > > it from your computer. Thank you.
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > cisco-voip mailing list
> > > > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-voip mailing list
> > > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070313/f3a1cbf7/attachment.html
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list