[cisco-voip] Location

[Matt Slaga (US)]

In any case, in order for them to do 20 conference calls at the local
site, you would need hardware conference resources at that location.
With them local, the locations would not count if the devices are in the
same location.

 

 

 

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ahmed Elnagar
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 3:42 PM
To: Robert Kulagowski
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Location

 

thank you all for ut fast replies. I know location based MLPP would do
it for me but still that is not the requirement the customer doesnot
want to drop running calls just he want to assign a certain bandwidth to
that special user and nobody else can use it. ther is no PSTN
connections that I can use AAR with it.

 

Thanks and Best Regards

Ahmed A. Elnagar
Network Field Engineer

 

Advanced Computer Technology (ACT)
16 Fawzy Ramah St.Off Shehab St.Mohandessin, Giza, Egypt 
Postal Code:12411 Cairo Egypt

Mob: +2010-2833868
Website: www.act-eg.com
E-mail: aelnagar at act-eg.com

 

________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net on behalf of Robert Kulagowski
Sent: Tue 27-Mar-07 9:26 PM
To: Ahmed Elnagar
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Location

> A customer has the following requirements.
> he has a location with 20 phones assigned to it, they have a bandwidth
> which enables them to make only 5 calls at a time. he wants to reserve
> bandwidth out of the 5 calls bandwidth for a certain user that nobody
> else can use. is it possible with CM ver 4.1(3)

I think that you're actually talking about two different things:

1)  Location-based CAC (Call Admission Control).  We use this because we
have a centralized Unity system with remote offices.  We set location
bandwidth (so you would do 5 calls times the bandwidth per call).  The
sixth call would then invoke AAR and could be routed via PSTN.
2)  MLPP (Multi-level Precedence and Preemption).  Your "special user"
could have a code which would make their call a priority call and would
then cause one of the other calls to terminate if there weren't enough
resources.

So, a combination of those two should allow you to achieve what you
want.
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070327/426dca0f/attachment.html