[cisco-voip] Cisco Unified PhoneProxy+7970 vs. 871 route+7970 r vs. Cisco VPN Client+IP Communicator

[Miller, Steve]

What is the latest IP Communicator version?  Has anything changed in the past 15 months?  Thanks.

________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net on behalf of Carter, Bill
Sent: Fri 11/2/2007 11:06 PM
To: Robert Kulagowski; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Unified PhoneProxy+7970 vs. 871 route+7970 r vs. Cisco VPN Client+IP Communicator



The latest version of IP communicator really improves call quality.

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Robert
Kulagowski
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 3:54 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco Unified PhoneProxy+7970 vs. 871 route+7970 r
vs. Cisco VPN Client+IP Communicator

Any thoughts on the relative merits of the above combinations?  We
currently deploy the VPN client + IP Communicator for home users, but
there are complaints of call quality issues (we use CM 4.1.3sr5 and
g.729).  Since we can't switch to iLBC we're looking at alternatives.

 From what I can gather, the PhoneProxy would still encrypt all traffic
over the Internet (control and voice), correct?

Is it any more "efficient", packet-wise or whatever, than a full-blown
VPN tunnel configuration that you'd get with a 871?

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip




--------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail message and any attached files are confidential
and are intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) 
named above. This communication may contain material 
protected by attorney-client, work product, or other 
privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or person 
responsible for delivering this confidential communication 
to the intended recipient, you have received this 
communication in error, and any review, use, dissemination, 
forwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution of 
this e-mail message and any attached files is strictly 
prohibited. Dickstein Shapiro reserves the right to monitor 
any communication that is created, received, or sent on its 
network.  If you have received this confidential 
communication in error, please notify the sender 
immediately by reply e-mail message and permanently delete 
the original message. 

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email 
to postmaster at dicksteinshapiro.com

Dickstein Shapiro LLP
http://www.DicksteinShapiro.com

==============================================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20071103/84c7481d/attachment-0001.html