[cisco-voip] IP Communicator or 79xx get iLBC ?

[Manoj Kalpage]

Jason, how you do this? Are there any special settings needs to be
done on CCM for this?

Thanks

On 11/4/07, Jason Aarons (US) <jason.aarons at us.didata.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I use Skype which uses iLBC (Internet Low Bandwidth Codec), I suspect the
> 79xx phones will eventually get it?
>
>
>
> It's amazing how a Skype calls sounds great, yet a IP Communicator call has
> issues. From my research it's the iLBC tolerates packet loss better.
> Typically I'm in a hotel and will use Skype over IP Communicator for calls.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Miller, Steve
>  Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 2:55 AM
>  To: Carter, Bill; Robert Kulagowski; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>  Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Unified PhoneProxy+7970 vs. 871 route+7970
> r vs. Cisco VPN Client+IP Communicator
>
>
>
>
>
> What is the latest IP Communicator version?  Has anything changed in the
> past 15 months?  Thanks.
>
>
>
>  ________________________________
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net on behalf of
> Carter, Bill
>  Sent: Fri 11/2/2007 11:06 PM
>  To: Robert Kulagowski; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>  Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Unified PhoneProxy+7970 vs. 871 route+7970
> r vs. Cisco VPN Client+IP Communicator
>
>
> The latest version of IP communicator really improves call quality.
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>  [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Robert
>  Kulagowski
>  Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 3:54 PM
>  To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>  Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco Unified PhoneProxy+7970 vs. 871 route+7970 r
>  vs. Cisco VPN Client+IP Communicator
>
>  Any thoughts on the relative merits of the above combinations?  We
>  currently deploy the VPN client + IP Communicator for home users, but
>  there are complaints of call quality issues (we use CM 4.1.3sr5 and
>  g.729).  Since we can't switch to iLBC we're looking at alternatives.
>
>   From what I can gather, the PhoneProxy would still encrypt all traffic
>  over the Internet (control and voice), correct?
>
>  Is it any more "efficient", packet-wise or whatever, than a full-blown
>  VPN tunnel configuration that you'd get with a 871?
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  cisco-voip mailing list
>  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>  https://puck..nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>  _______________________________________________
>  cisco-voip mailing list
>  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>  https://puck..nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> --------------------------------------------------------
> This e-mail message and any attached files are confidential
> and are intended solely for the use of the addressee(s)
> named above. This communication may contain material
> protected by attorney-client, work product, or other
> privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or person
> responsible for delivering this confidential communication
> to the intended recipient, you have received this
> communication in error, and any review, use, dissemination,
> forwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution of
> this e-mail message and any attached files is strictly
> prohibited. Dickstein Shapiro reserves the right to monitor
> any communication that is created, received, or sent on its
> network.  If you have received this confidential
> communication in error, please notify the sender
> immediately by reply e-mail message and permanently delete
> the original message.
>
> To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email
> to postmaster at dicksteinshapiro.com
>
> Dickstein Shapiro LLP
> http://www.DicksteinShapiro.com
>
> ==============================================================================
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
>
>  Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you
> are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and
> that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in
> error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting
> it from your computer. Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>