[cisco-voip] IP Communicator or 79xx get iLBC ?

Sat Nov 3 21:46:33 EDT 2007

Wait for it... ILBC is coming to new phones, IPC and transcoders. first
quarter next yr might be a happier place.

On 11/3/07, Craig Staffin <cmstaffin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Take a look at the next gen phones 7942 7962 and 7975
>
> These all support iLBC
>
> Craig
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons (US)
> Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 7:46 PM
> To: Manoj Kalpage
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IP Communicator or 79xx get iLBC ?
>
> Skype is a pay-per minute service unrelated to Cisco, typically a penny
> a minute in US and great international rates. Similar to MSN Messenger
> Calling, Yahoo Messenger Phone Out, etc.
>
> My comment was more about how great the iLBC is, and can Cisco add it to
> all products, royalty is usually a issue as with g729.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Manoj Kalpage [mailto:manoj.kalpage at gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 8:29 PM
> To: Jason Aarons (US)
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IP Communicator or 79xx get iLBC ?
>
> Jason, how you do this? Are there any special settings needs to be
> done on CCM for this?
>
> Thanks
>
> On 11/4/07, Jason Aarons (US) <jason.aarons at us.didata.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I use Skype which uses iLBC (Internet Low Bandwidth Codec), I suspect
> the
> > 79xx phones will eventually get it?
> >
> >
> >
> > It's amazing how a Skype calls sounds great, yet a IP Communicator
> call has
> > issues. From my research it's the iLBC tolerates packet loss better.
> > Typically I'm in a hotel and will use Skype over IP Communicator for
> calls.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> > Miller, Steve
> >  Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 2:55 AM
> >  To: Carter, Bill; Robert Kulagowski; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >  Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Unified PhoneProxy+7970 vs. 871
> route+7970
> > r vs. Cisco VPN Client+IP Communicator
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > What is the latest IP Communicator version?  Has anything changed in
> the
> > past 15 months?  Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> >  ________________________________
> >
> >
> > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net on behalf of
> > Carter, Bill
> >  Sent: Fri 11/2/2007 11:06 PM
> >  To: Robert Kulagowski; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >  Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Unified PhoneProxy+7970 vs. 871
> route+7970
> > r vs. Cisco VPN Client+IP Communicator
> >
> >
> > The latest version of IP communicator really improves call quality.
> >
> >  -----Original Message-----
> >  From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> >  [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> > Robert
> >  Kulagowski
> >  Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 3:54 PM
> >  To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >  Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco Unified PhoneProxy+7970 vs. 871
> route+7970 r
> >  vs. Cisco VPN Client+IP Communicator
> >
> >  Any thoughts on the relative merits of the above combinations?  We
> >  currently deploy the VPN client + IP Communicator for home users, but
> >  there are complaints of call quality issues (we use CM 4.1.3sr5 and
> >  g.729).  Since we can't switch to iLBC we're looking at alternatives.
> >
> >   From what I can gather, the PhoneProxy would still encrypt all
> traffic
> >  over the Internet (control and voice), correct?
> >
> >  Is it any more "efficient", packet-wise or whatever, than a
> full-blown
> >  VPN tunnel configuration that you'd get with a 871?
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  cisco-voip mailing list
> >  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >  https://puck..nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  cisco-voip mailing list
> >  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >  https://puck..nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> > --------------------------------------------------------
> > This e-mail message and any attached files are confidential
> > and are intended solely for the use of the addressee(s)
> > named above. This communication may contain material
> > protected by attorney-client, work product, or other
> > privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or person
> > responsible for delivering this confidential communication
> > to the intended recipient, you have received this
> > communication in error, and any review, use, dissemination,
> > forwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution of
> > this e-mail message and any attached files is strictly
> > prohibited. Dickstein Shapiro reserves the right to monitor
> > any communication that is created, received, or sent on its
> > network.  If you have received this confidential
> > communication in error, please notify the sender
> > immediately by reply e-mail message and permanently delete
> > the original message.
> >
> > To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email
> > to postmaster at dicksteinshapiro.com
> >
> > Dickstein Shapiro LLP
> > http://www.DicksteinShapiro.com
> >
> >
> ========================================================================
> ======
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> > confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
> designated
> > addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
> you
> > are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error
> and
> > that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly
> > prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
> communication in
> > error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and
> deleting
> > it from your computer. Thank you.
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
>
> -----------------------------------------
> Disclaimer:
>
> This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
> designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
> intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
> this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
> this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
> notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
> from your computer. Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20071103/4701328a/attachment.html 