[cisco-voip] OT: CIPTUG feedback?

[Voll, Scott]

By far the majority are still running 4.1.  new installs of 5.x, some
upgrades to 4.2 or 4.3 but ~75-85% was still 4.1.  and by far the
majority are going to upgrade to 6.1.

 

Scott

________________________________

From: CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com
[mailto:CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 6:32 AM
To: Voll, Scott
Cc: Bill Simon; Cisco VoIPoE List; cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net;
Lelio Fulgenzi
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] OT: CIPTUG feedback?

 


I went to the last 3 but missed this year as well.    Were there a lot
of people running or planning to soon upgrade to the 5.x, 6.x train?
Last year most were still on 4.x. One of the nice things about the
conference is getting feedback/advice directly from people on similiar
versions of the software.   There are definitely more people asking
about these versions on the list so I expect you would see that at the
conference as well. 

Carlos 




"Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca> 
Sent by: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net 

11/05/2007 03:13 PM 

To

"Bill Simon" <bills at psu.edu> 

cc

Cisco VoIPoE List <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 

Subject

Re: [cisco-voip] OT: CIPTUG feedback?

 

 

 




Thanks Bill. 
  
I sent a note out about a company that has replacement hookswitch
components. Our results so far have been positive. 
  
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>  
To: Cisco VoIPoE List <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>  
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 11:03 AM 
Subject: replacement hook switches for 7940/7960 

We just got a shipment of replacement hook switches from a company in
Texas (yee-haw). We're going to be testing them ASAP in a number of
failed phones. I'll do my best to keep the list up to speed on their
effectiveness, but they were pretty cheap so it's not a high cost
experiment. 
  
http://www.dvd-inc.com/detail.php?class_id=&goods_id=500
<http://www.dvd-inc.com/detail.php?class_id=&goods_id=500>  
  
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Simon" <bills at psu.edu <mailto:bills at psu.edu> > 
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca <mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca> > 
Cc: "Cisco VoIPoE List" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> > 
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 2:48 PM 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] OT: CIPTUG feedback? 

> Most common gripe in the user feedback sessions (edu., which I
attended, 
> and "open mic") was about switchhook problems.
> 
> Now, I don't spend a whole lot of time troubleshooting endpoints in my

> job.  But I was thinking... is this the best we could do?
> 
> We have Cisco's ears and all we can do is gripe about broken 
> switchhooks?  Wasted opportunity.  Good news for all who care about 
> switchhooks, the 79x2 (not 12) and newer have optical (rather than 
> mechanical) switchhooks. 
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps8536/index.html
<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps8536/index.html> 
> 
> The CM timeline looks promising.  The Cisco guys kept saying the next 
> release of 6.x will be "the next 4.1.3" - where everyone finds a
stable 
> version that they migrate to and sit on for a while.
> 
> On the show floor, Polycom showed a useful IP phone app used to
control 
> their video conference endpoints.  I really liked the demo I saw of 
> NetQoS's network and VoIP monitoring software.  Anyone use their
products?
> 
> Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>> I wouldn't mind hearing feedback from anyone who went to CIPTUG -
maybe 
>> some interesting non-NDA information?
> 
>_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20071106/a53ad8f0/attachment-0001.html