[cisco-voip] Home user
Linsemier, Matthew
MLinsemier at apcapital.com
Tue Oct 16 09:16:57 EDT 2007
We currently have about 40 production remote home teleworkers that have
been deployed using Cisco 871/877 wireless routers and a 7960 phones.
We are using a Cisco 3845 series router at the head-end so that we can
control QoS tagging on the egress / ingress points of both sides of the
VPN tunnel. We are using a phase 2 DMVPN solution dual-homed to two
sites to provide secure redundant connectivity.
It took me a bit to tweak my router configurations (I started on Cisco
831/837 routers) to get the results that we wanted, but all and all our
users are happy. There is the occasional jitter and packet loss (it is
the Internet mind you) but g.729 is working quite well coupled with
business cable and DSL services.
If you have any other questions, feel free to ask.
Matt
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Curt Shaffer
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 6:37 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Home user
I was wondering want everyone out there is using for the situation where
you have someone on your CCM or CCME that has 1 phone at a home office.
Something tells me an ASA is overkill and I haven't found solid
information that any of the 87x routers support tagging QoS of packets
going through the VPN tunnel. We would obviously like to have QoS in
place even though it's not respected at their ISP just to make sure the
VPN/Voice packets are leaving their routers first as a best effort to
get some quality.
Thanks
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT
This communication and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may
be protected by one or more legal privileges. It is intended
solely for the use of the addressee identified above. If you
are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying
or distribution of this communication is UNAUTHORIZED. Neither
this information block, the typed name of the sender, nor
anything else in this message is intended to constitute an
electronic signature unless a specific statement to the
contrary is included in this message. If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately contact me and delete
this communication from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20071016/f2855397/attachment.html
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list