[cisco-voip] SRST

Michael Thompson mthompson729 at gmail.com
Wed Oct 24 20:22:53 EDT 2007


Erik,

    The only TRUE way to simulate it is to bring down MGCP and truly enter
the DEFAULT applicaiton state (H.323 / SRST).  If all you're trying to test
is the ability to write H.323 dial peers then you can do just that.  The
problem is that unless you break MGCP, it doesn't go into fallback state
from a system perspective.  In the MGCP fallback config segment, it refers
to Application Alternate DEFAULT (differs from version to version on the
syntax).  That's the mode you go into after MGCP dies.  Once you're there,
the MGCP dial peers go down and your H.323 dial peers take over (including
your PRI local association).  That's going to be the only real way to test
if SRST is going to work.

MAKE SURE you configure the Applicaiton Alternate DEFAULT.  failure to do so
will give VERY eratic results (personal experience) and HOURS of lost bliss
banging your head against the wall.

my 2 pennies.

On 10/23/07, Erik Stillman <Erik.Stillman at shearman.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Andrew, it's exactly what I did.
>
>
> Anyway to get those dial-peers working with like an FXO?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Riley, Andrew" <Andrew.Riley at getronics.com>@SHSDOMAIN
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 3:29 PM
> To: Erik Stillman; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] SRST
>
> Put an ACL in the network to force the one phone to register to SRST.
>
> If you are doing MGCP, then the ISDN interface is under the control of
> CCM and won't work with the dial peers.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Erik Stillman
> Sent: Tuesday, 23 October 2007 7:11 AM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] SRST
>
> Hey guys, is it possible to test one single phone on SRST while the rest
> of the site is registered to CallManager?
>
> I can get the test registered with the gateway, but it won't dial out.
> Does this have something got do with the PRI being MGCP controlled?
>
> My goal is to do some testing without having to take the site down.
>
> All input appreciated!
>
> Many thanks,
> Erik
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net@SHSDOMAIN On Behalf Of
> cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 4:13 PM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 56, Issue 135
>
> Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
>        cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
> "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
>
>
> ***********************************************************************
>
> This communication is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, by
> the recipient or any other person for the purpose of avoiding United
> States federal tax penalties that may be imposed on the recipient or
> such other person. In addition, if any United States federal tax advice
> contained in this communication is used or referred to in promoting,
> marketing or recommending any corporation, partnership or other entity,
> investment plan, concept, structure or arrangement (which should be
> assumed to be the case by a recipient or other person who is not our
> client with respect to the subject matter of the communication), then
> (i) such tax advice should be construed as written to support the
> promotion or marketing of the transactions or matters addressed by the
> advice and (ii) the recipient or other person should seek advice based
> on the recipient or other person's particular circumstances from an
> independent tax advisor. For further information, please go to
> http://www.shearman.com/disclaimer/tax_disclosure.html
>
> ***********************************************************************
>
> This transmittal and/or attachments may be a confidential
> attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged or
> confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any review,
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this transmittal and/or attachments in
> error, please notify us immediately by reply or by telephone (call us
> collect at +1 212-848-8400) and immediately delete this message and all
> its attachments.
>
> Shearman & Sterling LLP is a limited liability partnership organized in
> the United States under the laws of the State of Delaware, which laws
> limit the personal liability of partners.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20071024/fa9e9e3e/attachment.html 


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list