[cisco-voip] Inbound calls

[Rogers, Jeremy]

Hmmm, guess its time for some infrastructure changes.

 

________________________________

From: Tim Reimers [mailto:treimers at ashevillenc.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 9:08 AM
To: Adam
Cc: Scott Voll; Rogers, Jeremy; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Inbound calls

 

yeah, there is that...

 

________________________________

From: adam.blomfield at gmail.com [mailto:adam.blomfield at gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Adam
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 9:25 PM
To: Tim Reimers
Cc: Scott Voll; Rogers, Jeremy; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Inbound calls

Unless you like calling name delivery... 

On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Tim Reimers <treimers at ashevillenc.gov>
wrote:

 

yeah --- sorry about that.
I didn't realise you were hoping for something for MGCP as well --
thought the other guy was.

H.323 ROCKS!
;-) 



-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Voll [mailto:svoll.voip at gmail.com]
Sent: Mon 3/31/2008 6:24 PM
To: Tim Reimers
Cc: Lelio Fulgenzi; Rogers, Jeremy; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Inbound calls

the script is also H323 depended.

So from MGCP it's still a no go.

Scott

On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Tim Reimers <treimers at ashevillenc.gov>
wrote:

>  Yup.
>
> There's a good (but TAC unsupported) TCL script available that's able
to
> read the ANI, and send all matching calls to just ONE internal
destination
> DID.
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Scott Voll
> *Sent:* Monday, March 31, 2008 2:10 PM
> *To:* Lelio Fulgenzi
> *Cc:* Rogers, Jeremy; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Inbound calls
>
>   yep.  thus far..... unless something changed resently it can only be
> done via H323 VGWs. and since the 6608 is MGCP only... your up a
creek......
>
> Might look at a CMM blade as an upgrade.
>
> Scott
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> wrote:
>
> > not with 6608s. i think 6608s can only support MGCP.
> >
> > scott v. can confirm.
> >
> > you need h.323 to do this sort of stuff.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Paul" <asobihoudai at yahoo.com>
> > To: "Rogers, Jeremy" <Jeremy.Rogers at wmg.com>; <
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 1:45 PM
> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Inbound calls
> >
> >
> >  > Jeremy
> > >
> > > I could be mistaken, but I think you can do it with
> > > voice translation rules and profiles.
> > >
> > > Paul
> > > --- "Rogers, Jeremy" <Jeremy.Rogers at wmg.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Is there any way to block inbound calls based on the
> > >> ANI of the calling
> > >> party?  The terminating gateway is a 6608.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Jeremy Rogers
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> cisco-voip mailing list
> > >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
________________________________________________________________________
____________
> > > Special deal for Yahoo! users & friends - No Cost. Get a month of
> > > Blockbuster Total Access now
> > > http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text3.com
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-voip mailing list
> > > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
>
>


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080401/d2847bc2/attachment.html