[cisco-voip] SIP Trunk with FAC/CMC

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

Now you know my conundrum. It's not very clear with respect to SIP trunks. The document states it requires MGCP and doesn't work on H323. That's it, no mention of SIP.

Lelio
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Java-Clavis-Domus Theorem: The ability to keep your hands on the home keys is inversely
related to the amount of caffeine ingested in the last 30 minutes. 

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Aman Chugh 
  To: Lelio Fulgenzi 
  Cc: Jonathan Charles ; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
  Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:47 AM
  Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Trunk with FAC/CMC


  I spoke to soon , Yes it is not supported on H.323 analog gateways

  H.323 analog gateways do not support FAC or CMC because these gateways cannot play tones

  Aman

   
  On 4/8/08, Aman Chugh <aman.chugh at gmail.com> wrote: 
    I am not sure if FAC/CMC is not supported with H.323, I believe FAC/CMC is a ccm function and should be gateway protocol independent. As these are prompted and enabled on ccm Route patterns. 

    Maybe Wes or Ryan can confirm.

    Aman


    On 4/8/08, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote: 
      Well, I'm sure you use the same route patterns with H323 and FXO ports but we already know that FACs are not supported on those.

      Any of the Cisco guys have any comments? I guess I could open a TAC case for confirmation.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
      Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
      (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
      "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
       
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Aman Chugh 
        To: Lelio Fulgenzi 
        Cc: Jonathan Charles ; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
        Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 5:33 AM
        Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Trunk with FAC/CMC

         
        SIP route patterns are used for domain routing/URL dialing , You can use regular route  patterns for digit dialing and as J said it should work with regular route patterns.


        Aman

         
        On 4/8/08, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote: 
          In the documentation, it has special instructions for SIP route patterns and
          the configuration options listed does not have FAC/CMC.

          Is anyone out there using SIP trunks with the regular route patterns or do
          you have to use the SIP route patterns?


          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
          Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
          (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
          "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt

          ----- Original Message -----
          From: "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com>
          To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
          Cc: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
          Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 11:20 PM
          Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Trunk with FAC/CMC


          >I wouldn't see why not, just configure them on the route-patterns and
          > point the route-patterns to the trunks (RLs, RGs...)
          >
          >
          >
          > Jonathan
          >
          > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
          >>
          >>
          >> I'm not sure if I posted this before, but can anyone confirm that FACs
          >> are
          >> not compatible with SIP trunks? We heavily use FACs for our residence and
          >> will likely need to go forward with continuing to use them. We wanted to
          >> evaluate SIP trunks as a replacement to our PRI service but when I looked
          >> up
          >> a SIP route pattern in the CCM 6.1 admin guide there was no FAC/CMC
          >> option.
          >>
          >> Comments?
          >>
          >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          >> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
          >> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
          >> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
          >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
          >> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
          >>
          >> _______________________________________________
          >>  cisco-voip mailing list
          >>  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
          >>  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
          >>
          >>
          >

          _______________________________________________
          cisco-voip mailing list
          cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
          https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip






-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080408/5f51c844/attachment-0001.html