[cisco-voip] CUCM Location question

[Justin Steinberg]

callsinprogress does not track bandwidth values.  it tracks the number of
inter-location calls that involve an endpoint in that location.   So your
counter value of '39' means that 39 endpoints in that location are on an
active call with an endpoint in another location or the <none> location.

to track bandwidth values you'll want to look at bandwidthavailable and
bandwidthmaximum

this is what i observe with 4.1.3


On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Erick Bergquist <erickbee at gmail.com>
wrote:

> It is showing the same amount of bandwidth used after a resync of
> bandwidth, with no calls. I should have mentioned that in my original
> post
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Matthew Saskin <matt at saskin.net> wrote:
> > Location-based CAC uses a fixed amount of bandwidth based on protocol.
> > 24kbps for G.729 and 80kbps for G.711 iirc.  If you're seeing bandwidth
> > being used without any calls in progress, I'd suggest doing a resync for
> > that location (resync button is on the location page in ccmadmin).
> >
> >  Erick Bergquist wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Does signalling traffic count toward location bandwidth?
> > >
> > > Have a setup where a site has audio bandwidth set to 1544, and when
> > > there are no phone calls active, it is using 39 bandwidth for
> > > CallsInProgress object under Locations in RTMT.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-voip mailing list
> > > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080413/ff77d8dc/attachment.html