[cisco-voip] CCM 6.1 Node Configuration Data for Certificate

Tue Apr 15 22:10:54 EDT 2008

Oh, I don't know.... how about other corporate sites located across the country also using SIP trunking . If not, well, we have done the best we could with the technology available  Then again we could always use BIX or 110 blocks,  they are much harder to keep a Butt Set attached to .......

>>> "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com> 4/15/2008 7:44 PM >>>
What kind of security do you think there is on the other end of that
SIP provider?

Just curious...

Jonathan

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 5:37 PM, STEVEN CASPER <SCASPER at mtb.com> wrote:
>
>
> sigh.......I know, but I am a customer running a VoIP implementation at a
> large financial institution. If added security is available for any
> application it will be considered. Also maybe not anytime soon but I think
> the days of the Butt Set and the 66 block and its cousins are numbered for
> large enterprise PSTN customers. Centralized or regional SIP trunking holds
> a lot of promise both feature wise and financially. Just my two cents.
>
>  So all Certificate Signing Request related fields common across servers or
> not? Then again it seems you would set them up for the appropriate State and
> building location...and I wonder what unit is supposed to designate!
>
> Steve
>
> >>> "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com> 4/15/2008 12:51 PM >>>
>
>
> You will?
>
> Why?
>
> Any time a cust says they want security, I pull out a Butts set and go
> to their 66 block.... you can do the same thing at telco...
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:46 AM, STEVEN CASPER <SCASPER at mtb.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Thanks Jonathan,
> >
> > That is one of my concerns. I imagine at some point in the future I will
> > need to secure the phones. So it sounds like these fields should match
> > across servers if possible.....?
> >
> > >>> "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com> 4/15/2008 11:13 AM >>>
> >
> >
> > This info is just for the TLS certificate for the web page... it would
> > be cool if it matched across nodes, but it doesn't matter, unless you
> > are securing your phones too...
> >
> >
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:54 AM, STEVEN CASPER <SCASPER at mtb.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Question about a couple of parameters associated with setting up the
> > > Certificate Signing Request during the 6.1 upgrade. These are:
> > >
> > > Country
> > > Location
> > > Organization
> > > State
> > > Unit
> > >
> > > Does it matter if this info is identical across Call Manager servers or
> > > should at least one field be unique?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Steve
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ************************************
> > >  This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information that
> is
> > > intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the
> intended
> > > recipient or entity, you are strictly prohibited from disclosing,
> copying,
> > > distributing or using any of the information contained in the
> > transmission.
> > > If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > > immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic
> > or
> > > hard copy. This communication may contain nonpublic personal information
> > > about consumers subject to the restrictions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley
> Act
> > > and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. You may not directly or indirectly reuse or
> > > disclose such information for any purpose other than to provide the
> > services
> > > for which you are receiving the information.
> > >  There are risks associated with the use of electronic transmission. The
> > > sender of this information does not control the method of transmittal or
> > > service providers and assumes no duty or obligation for the security,
> > > receipt, or third party interception of this transmission.
> > >  ************************************
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > >  cisco-voip mailing list
> > >  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
> > >  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ************************************
> >  This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information that is
> > intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended
> > recipient or entity, you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying,
> > distributing or using any of the information contained in the
> transmission.
> > If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic
> or
> > hard copy. This communication may contain nonpublic personal information
> > about consumers subject to the restrictions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
> > and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. You may not directly or indirectly reuse or
> > disclose such information for any purpose other than to provide the
> services
> > for which you are receiving the information.
> >  There are risks associated with the use of electronic transmission. The
> > sender of this information does not control the method of transmittal or
> > service providers and assumes no duty or obligation for the security,
> > receipt, or third party interception of this transmission.
> >  ************************************
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
>
>
>
>
>
> ************************************
>  This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information that is
> intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended
> recipient or entity, you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying,
> distributing or using any of the information contained in the transmission.
> If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or
> hard copy. This communication may contain nonpublic personal information
> about consumers subject to the restrictions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
> and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. You may not directly or indirectly reuse or
> disclose such information for any purpose other than to provide the services
> for which you are receiving the information.
>  There are risks associated with the use of electronic transmission. The
> sender of this information does not control the method of transmittal or
> service providers and assumes no duty or obligation for the security,
> receipt, or third party interception of this transmission.
>  ************************************
>

************************************
This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information that is intended solely for the use of the addressee.  If you are not the intended recipient or entity, you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing or using any of the information contained in the transmission.  If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  This communication may contain nonpublic personal information about consumers subject to the restrictions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.  You may not directly or indirectly reuse or disclose such information for any purpose other than to provide the services for which you are receiving the information.
There are risks associated with the use of electronic transmission.  The sender of this information does not control the method of transmittal or service providers and assumes no duty or obligation for the security, receipt, or third party interception of this transmission.
************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080415/a124b22e/attachment.html 