[cisco-voip] CUCM 7
Voice Noob
voicenoob at gmail.com
Thu Dec 4 11:21:56 EST 2008
Thanks for the upgrade part number for IPCC / UCCX . Next time time read the
e-mail chain.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Sandy Lee <Sandy.Lee at sit.ulaval.ca> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Yes you can upgrade from 4.x to 7.x, product number is CCX-70-UPG.
>
>
>
> Regards.
>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> Sandy Lee
>
> Analyst
>
> Laval University
>
> 1055, ave du Seminaire
>
> Quebec (Quebec) G1V 0A6
>
> Email : Sandy.Lee at sit.ulaval.ca
>
> ( 418.656.2131, ext. 4420
>
> _______________________________
>
> *Avis relatif à la confidentialité / Notice of confidentiality*<http://www.rec.ulaval.ca/lce/securite/confidentialite.htm>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Voice Noob
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 04, 2008 9:29 AM
> *To:* Lelio Fulgenzi
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net; Michael Back
>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 7
>
>
>
> I think this is where they are headed. I had an SE tell me they were going
> this way so that it would cost more not to have UCSS. ALso are you sure you
> can purchase an upgrade from 4.x to 7.X just as an example?
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>
> I really think Cisco shot themselves (and us) in the foot by demising SASU
> and creating UCSS. If it was still SASU, we would buy SASU every year. But
> now, we're gonna simply buy the upgrade when necessary. As long as it's not
> every two years, we're financially better off. Granted we won't get all the
> bells and whistles, but we'll still have a phone system. I'm just waiting
> for them to implement an N-1 upgrade limit which says you can only upgrade
> to version 8 if you are on v7. Then we're really screwed. ;)
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Back" <Michael.Back at nisd.net>
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>
> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2008 8:50:06 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 7
>
> Thanks for the input. Upgrading beyond 7 is not an issue for us due to
> financial reasons. We have the 6.1 and 7 software now; we are just
> waiting on some new hardware and the time to put it all together. I was
> really hoping that someone else would have already installed 7, but I
> guess it is still fairly new.
>
> >>> "Carter, Bill" <bcarter at sentinel.com> 12/3/2008 11:00 PM >>>
> I would expect a CM version upgrade at least every 18 months. That
> would mean CM 8.0 in Spring/Summer 2010.
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio
> Fulgenzi
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 3:50 PM
> To: Michael Back
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 7
>
>
>
> I may have mentioned it on the list a while back. I came to this
> conclusion for the simple fact that the release date of v7 was only 6 to
> 8 months after the release of v6 or something like that. We were told
> that originally this would be 12 months and then that moved to 18
> months. How could they have done it in 8?
>
> So, honestly, I think it's somewhere in the middle. ;)
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Back" <Michael.Back at nisd.net>
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2008 4:14:51 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada
> Eastern
> Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM 7
>
> I read somewhere (maybe here) that CUCM 7 is pretty much the same as
> 6.1, but with a name change to be more consistent with the other
> products. Does anyone know if this is true? The reason I am asking
> is
> because we are going to upgrade end of first quarter next year, and I
> am
> trying to decide if we will go with 6.1 or 7. If I go with 7 I won't
> have to worry about a major upgrade for another 3 to 5 years, only
> minor
> upgrades. Has anyone had any direct experience with 7? Please share
> any useful information you may have. Thanks.
>
> Mike Back
> VoIP Systems Administrator
> Northside ISD
> michael.back at nisd.net
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081204/c5046b5b/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list