[cisco-voip] Drop call for 911?

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

There's actually a parameter that will bump down an executive override to the next lowest level, allowing future executive override calls to bump a previous bumper. oh the fun. 


--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com> 
To: "Jason Fuermann" <JBF005 at shsu.edu> 
Cc: "cisco-voip voyp list" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>, "Dennis Heim" <Dennis.Heim at cdw.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 1:11:21 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Drop call for 911? 

forgive my terminology here, i worked on the feature but resisted the dictionary. 

i believe MLPP can only preempt a lower priority call. the first 4 911 calls will go with the same priority level. the 5th call has the same priority level as the previous 4. 5th call will not preempt the previous 4 calls of the same level. 

if you're saying that calls 1-4 are 'normal' calls with lower priority then the 5th call can route via 911 translation pattern, increase priority, and preemtp the first calls. you can setup locations CAC to get the gateway only allowing 4 calls. MLPP will interact with CAC to drop the existing call. 

All that said enabling MLPP changes lots of native CUCM behavior such as forwarding intercepts. this may be an overkill. 

/wes 

On Monday, December 15, 2008 9:34:19 AM, Fuermann, Jason <JBF005 at shsu.edu> wrote: 





I only say that because I have not heard of anyone successfully using MLPP for 911, and without MLPP there is only one way to ensure a 911 call goes out. 





From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [ mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net ] On Behalf Of Dennis Heim 
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 7:29 PM 
To: Fuermann, Jason; lelio at uoguelph.ca ; Scott Voll 
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Drop call for 911? 



CAMA is old school… but they work and do their job without much work at all. 




Dennis Heim 
Network Voice Engineer 
Berbee 
11711 N. Meridian Street, Suite 225 
Carmel, IN 46032 

317.569.4255 Office 
317.569.4201 Fax 
317.694.6070 Cell 

dennis.heim at cdw.com 
www.berbee.com 





From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [ mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net ] On Behalf Of Fuermann, Jason 
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 4:56 PM 
To: ' lelio at uoguelph.ca '; Scott Voll 
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Drop call for 911? 



Don’t rule out a CAMA trunk 





From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [ mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net ] On Behalf Of lelio at uoguelph.ca 
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 3:09 PM 
To: Scott Voll 
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Drop call for 911? 




Looks like BRI time for you! 

Lelio Fulgenzi, Senior Analyst 


Computing & Communications 


University of Guelph 


519-824-4120 x56354 





...sent from my iPod - please pardon my fat fingers ;) 





[XKJ2000] 



On Dec 12, 2008, at 3:58 PM, "Scott Voll" < svoll.voip at gmail.com > wrote: 





H323 is supported? with FXO? 





It seems Like FXO on a MGCP VGW may not be supported. 





Scott 





sr. 610287387 


On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Ryan Ratliff < rratliff at cisco.com > wrote: 


I've never configured it personally but it does show that H.323 gateways are supported for MLPP. 





You'd definitely have to do some testing. 





-Ryan 







On Dec 12, 2008, at 2:00 PM, Michael Thompson wrote: 




I know a couple of people that have tried to use MLPP for this app. 





If you look at the specs, there are specific requirements for use of MLPP. 


Analog lines don't fit into that spec. 











-----Original Message----- 


From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net 


[ mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net ] On Behalf Of lelio at uoguelph.ca 


Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:45 PM 


To: Scott Voll 


Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 


Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Drop call for 911? 





MLPP enabled route patterns? 





Lelio Fulgenzi, Senior Analyst 


Computing & Communications 


University of Guelph 


519-824-4120 x56354 





...sent from my iPod - please pardon my fat fingers ;) 





[XKJ2000] 





On Dec 11, 2008, at 2:50 PM, "Scott Voll" < svoll.voip at gmail.com > wrote: 







I have a site that has 4 Pots lines and those are also the lines 


they would dial 911 on. if all 4 lines were in use, is there a way 


to disconnect one so that the 911 call could still go out? CM 6.1.2? 





other options beside more Pots lines or removing one of the incoming 


lines? 





TIA 





Scott 


_______________________________________________ 


cisco-voip mailing list 


cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 


https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 


_______________________________________________ 


cisco-voip mailing list 


cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 


https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 





_______________________________________________ 


cisco-voip mailing list 


cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 


https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 




_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 

_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081216/af4d3d21/attachment-0001.html>