[cisco-voip] CME-in-SRST mode with Extension Mobility

[Kelemen Zoltan]

for the record, later CME versions (4.3+, I think) do support EM, and 
CME can be used instead of SRST for SRST-like fallback nowadays :)

I haven't done this, so this isn't more than my 2c, but I think on one 
hand it should work, but on the other, users, etc. will all need to be 
locally defined and thus it has a good probability of confusing the 
users when the system goes into fallback mode. The previously logged-in 
phones might fall back to a logout profile, usernames/passwords are 
certainly not synchronized between the two systems, so they might not 
match, and so on.

regards,
Zoltan

Michael Thompson wrote:
>
> I don’t think that CME supports EM in any form.
>
> What is it you mean by CME in SRST?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net 
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *kmarus
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 16, 2008 7:42 PM
> *To:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] CME-in-SRST mode with Extension Mobility
>
> I am aware that Unified SRST does not support Extension Mobility 
> however does CME in SRST fallback mode support Extension Mobility?
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>