[cisco-voip] iLBC and Cisco 7965s...

[Jonathan Charles]

Well, I have a lot of customers who are aggregating a LOT of PRIs on
6608s... what is Cisco going to replace it with?


Jonathan

On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 10:37 AM, <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:

> I'm gonna miss being able to register one port to one cluster and another
> port to a different cluster.
>
> Lelio Fulgenzi, Senior AnalystComputing & Communications
> University of Guelph
> 519-824-4120 x56354
>
> ...sent from my iPod - please pardon my fat fingers ;)
>
> [XKJ2000]
>
> On Dec 27, 2008, at 10:25 AM, "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Yeah, that sucks... I kind of like the 6608... but we just got a 2821 so,
> we will use that instead...
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Linsemier, Matthew <<MLinsemier at apassurance.com>
> MLinsemier at apassurance.com> wrote:
>
>>  I was informed that the CCM-ACT's will not support this Codec either, so
>> I was a bit annoyed by this as well.  I would guess that the 6608 will
>> probably fall in the same boat.  It looks like DSP farms in routers running
>> IOS is the way that Cisco wants us to transcode in the future.
>>
>>
>>
>> MAtt
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net>
>> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:<cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net>
>> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Jonathan Charles
>> *Sent:* Friday, December 19, 2008 2:56 PM
>> *To:* Ryan Ratliff
>> *Cc:* <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] iLBC and Cisco 7965s...
>>
>>
>>
>> Right, I found the same info... it seems well supported in 12.4.15T and
>> above in IOS (MGCP and H.323) but I have been unable to find any info on
>> transcoding/support on a 6608... my guess is the DSPs can't handle the
>> codec...
>>
>> Annoying.
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Ryan Ratliff < <rratliff at cisco.com>
>> rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>> Can't seem to find the 6608 downloads on cisco.com but the first place I
>> see that 6608 load is in a devpack from May of this year.  That's actually a
>> lot newer than I would have thought.
>>
>>
>>
>> The gist of my first email is that I don't think you're going to see
>> support for iLBC on the 6608.
>>
>>
>>
>> Unity Connections 7.0(1) I can see supports iLBC, not sure on the Unity
>> TSP.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Ryan
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 19, 2008, at 12:45 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
>>
>>
>> Well, I am running CCM 7.0.1
>>
>> The 6608 is running D00404000032 (base load from ccm 7)
>>
>> Unity TSP is 8.3.1
>>
>> 7965 is running 8.4.1S (iLBC was supported in 8.3)
>>
>> Not sure what TSP or 6608 load supports iLBC...
>>
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>>
>>  On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Ryan Ratliff < <rratliff at cisco.com>
>> rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>> What load is your 6608 running?  What date was that load released?
>>
>> When did the IP phones start supporting iLBC?
>>
>>
>>
>> I think the answer to those questions will tell you why you can't get
>> calls to your 6608 to use iLBC.
>>
>>
>>
>> As for Unity it just depends on if they have a TSP that supports iLBC.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Ryan
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 19, 2008, at 12:33 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
>>
>>
>> OK, so how do we get this to work...?
>>
>> I have Cisco 7965s at remote sites (user's homes) and when they make
>> calls, their codec is showing up as G.729, even tho their region is iLBC
>> (G.728).
>>
>> My voice gateway is a 6608 (single PRI, rest are transcoders, conf
>> bridges)...
>>
>> Calls to Unity use G.729 as well...
>>
>> Calls to other 7965s (on net) are iLBC...
>>
>> So, how do I support this codec
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>
>> <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>
>> <https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip>
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT
>> This communication and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be
>> protected by one or more legal privileges. It is intended solely for the use
>> of the addressee identified above. If you are not the intended recipient,
>> any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this communication is
>> UNAUTHORIZED. Neither this information block, the typed name of the sender,
>> nor anything else in this message is intended to constitute an electronic
>> signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this
>> message. If you have received this communication in error, please
>> immediately contact me and delete this communication from your computer.
>> Thank you.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081227/69550207/attachment.html>