[cisco-voip] vg224 dialpeers

[Ryan Ratliff]

I'd guess they will cause transients and enough of these can cause an impact
to the server, depending on how fast the devices are trying to register.
Just as with a VG248 I'd very much recommend shutting down any ports not in
use.  Alternatively you can configure them in CCM but not give them a DN.
 

-Ryan 

 

  _____  

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 3:05 PM
To: Cisco Voyp List
Subject: [cisco-voip] vg224 dialpeers


In order to get a vg224 port to register I had to put:
 
dial-peer voice 223 pots
 service stcapp
 port 2/23

Is there any caveat with putting this on all ports whether they are
configured in CCM or not? If I do, do they result in transient connections?
 
Lelio
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
"Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo."      WJR

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080214/d3f3a107/attachment-0001.html