[cisco-voip] CM 5.1(3) and GKs

Hesham Moussa Hesham.Moussa at vanco.co.uk
Fri Jan 18 04:38:29 EST 2008


Hi all,

 

I have this niggly cosmetic issue that I am trying to get rid of as I am
sure it will cause issues in operations so I thought I would ask the
experts here what they think?

 

I have the following topology:

 

CM ----> H.323 Trunk GK1 ---> DGK ---> GK2 ---> H.323 Trunk GK1 ---> CME

 

Now when a call originates from the CM cluster to the CME cluster, I see
the call as 16kbps as I should:

 

uk-lab-ipt-gk1#sh gatekee call

Total number of active calls = 1.

                         GATEKEEPER CALL INFO

                         ====================

LocalCallID                        Age(secs)   BW

19-32942                           4           16(Kbps)

 Endpt(s): Alias                 E.164Addr

   src EP: GK1-Trunk_1           1201

           CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port

           10.200.6.2      42549 10.200.6.2      34668

 Endpt(s): Alias                 E.164Addr

   dst EP:                       1702

           CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port

           10.200.6.235    1720  10.200.6.235    1720 

 

uk-lab-ipt-gk1#

 

 

uk-lab-ipt-gk2#sh gatekeep call

Total number of active calls = 1.

                         GATEKEEPER CALL INFO

                         ====================

LocalCallID                        Age(secs)   BW

53-32942                           2           16(Kbps)

 Endpt(s): Alias                 E.164Addr

   src EP: 1201                  1201

 Endpt(s): Alias                 E.164Addr

   dst EP:                       1702

           CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port

           10.200.6.235    1720  10.200.6.235    61701

 

uk-lab-ipt-gk2#

 

 

BUT, when the call originates from the CME cluster going to the CM
cluster, the gatekeeper output on GK1 states it is 128kbps (G.711a)
whilst for GK2, it states its 16kbps as expected.

 

uk-lab-ipt-gk1#sh gatekee call

Total number of active calls = 1.

                         GATEKEEPER CALL INFO

                         ====================

LocalCallID                        Age(secs)   BW

20-46999                           6           128(Kbps)

 Endpt(s): Alias                 E.164Addr

   src EP:                       1702

 Endpt(s): Alias                 E.164Addr

   dst EP: GK1-Trunk_1           1201

           CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port

           10.200.6.2      42549 10.200.6.2      34668

 

uk-lab-ipt-gk1#

 

 

uk-lab-ipt-gk2#sh gatekeep call

Total number of active calls = 1.

                         GATEKEEPER CALL INFO

                         ====================

LocalCallID                        Age(secs)   BW

54-46999                           8           16(Kbps)

 Endpt(s): Alias                 E.164Addr

   src EP:                       1702

           CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port

           10.200.6.235    1720  10.200.6.235    61701

 Endpt(s): Alias                 E.164Addr

   dst EP:                       1201

           CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port

           10.200.6.2      42549 10.200.6.2      42549

 

uk-lab-ipt-gk2#

 

I checked the stats on both phones and they are both G.729 in both
directions.

 

A debug H.245 ASN1 on the CME shows G.729 only.

 

For all intents and purposes it is working as it should BUT the output
is wrong and I have a feeling it's the CM.

 

Any insight appreciated.

 

Regards,

 

H

 



**********************************************************************
Any opinions expressed in the e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily the company. This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this e-mail in error, or if you are concerned with the content of this e-mail please e-mail to: e-security.support at vanco.info

The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software viruses which could damage your own computer system. Whilst the sender has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we can not accept liability for any damage which you sustain as a result of software viruses. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening this e-mail or any attachments to this e-mail. 

This e-mail was sent from Vanco UK Limited a company registered in England under number 2296733 and whose registered office is Units 1&2, Great West Plaza, Riverbank Way, Brentford, TW8 9RE, UK

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
********************************************************************** 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080118/caf26056/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list