[cisco-voip] ode to 6608
Scott Voll
svoll.voip at gmail.com
Fri Jan 25 12:32:26 EST 2008
since your running the 6608 you must have Cat 65xx boxes. why are you
looking at 3845s rather then the CMM blade? your port density and
conferencing is awesome. The thing has just works for us.
Scott
On Jan 25, 2008 9:05 AM, Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:
> that is a mixed bag. IF you got the 6608 to work (registration, c6k
> backplane issues, echo) then it was set it and forget it. However, there
> was terrible serviceability to help get it working or figure out why it
> broke.
>
> On the sentimental road, I always had a soft spot for the dt-24+. True,
> it could be a bit fickle about getting a DHCP address occasionally, but
> otherwise it was the first Cisco product to offer 24 or 32 msec ecan, well
> before it was available in 6608 or IOS. It was also TRIVIAL to configure.
> Back in the day it was heresy to recommend a PC board over a Cisco box, but
> it worked when IOS/6608 folks could not fathom why anyone would truly need
> more that 16msec of ecan coverage.
>
> /Wes
>
> Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
>
> many, we got spoiled with the 6608.
>
> those things were great
>
> 8 ports which can be used for T1 or Conferencing or Transcoding and
> conferences could be up to 32 participant. and the ports could be registered
> to different clusters.
>
> now we're looking at replacing them with 3845s, what a let down.
>
> max 8 conference participants, and if your using MGCP (long live MGCP!),
> you can only register ports to one cluster.
>
> anyone else miss the 6608?
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing listcisco-voip at puck.nether.nethttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080125/732b661c/attachment.html
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list