[cisco-voip] using my DSPs on a 3845
Ryan Ratliff
rratliff at cisco.com
Fri Jan 25 16:56:08 EST 2008
If you configured the 'codec complexity flex' and it doesn't show up
then it's a default.
The dspfarm command does simply enable the DSPs to be used as a
dspfarm by the sccp process.
-Ryan
On Jan 25, 2008, at 4:55 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
OK. I'll plan to do that sometime.
What does that do? Basically open up the DSPs for individual usage
and assignment?
Does that then allow me to add the "codec complexity flex" command?
or is that on by default as I suggested?
----- Original Message -----
From: Ryan Ratliff
To: Lelio Fulgenzi
Cc: Cisco VoIPoE List
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] using my DSPs on a 3845
voice-card 0
no dspfarm
That needs to be corrected first. Either the command 'dspfarm' or
'dsp services dspfarm' needs to be present as the first step.
-Ryan
On Jan 25, 2008, at 4:24 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
OK - now I'm worried.....
kc-vgw(config)#dspfarm profile 105 conference
kc-vgw(config-dspfarm-profile)#maximum sessions ?
<0-0> Number of sessions assigned to this profile
This doesn't seem to make sense to me.
When I ran/run the DSP calc (see below), it says I that one PVDM64
should suffice (using the optimized result). When I tried adding the
CLI suggestion, I'm pretty sure it didn't make any difference in the
show running, which I was told because it was the default.
Optimal Results
voice-card 0
codec complexity flex
What I have:
voice-card 0
no dspfarm
!
DSP Requirements
Onboard CLI Information
Optimized Result(Default)
3 DSP(s).
one PVDM2-48
or
one PVDM2-16 + one PVDM2-32 CLI Info
Normal Result
6 DSP(s).
one PVDM2-32 + one PVDM2-64
or
two PVDM2-48
or
three PVDM2-32 CLI Info
Worst Case Result
N/A
N/A
----- Original Message -----
From: Ryan Ratliff
To: Lelio Fulgenzi
Cc: Cisco VoIPoE List
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] using my DSPs on a 3845
It gets a little murky with the flex DSPs and how many are required
depend on what voice codecs are being used.
Your best bet is to configure a sccp profile for either conference or
transcode. See what the 'max-sessions' command will allow you to
set. If you have enough free DSPs then when you do 'max-sess ?' the
result will include a non-zero number, ie '0-10' or similar instead
of '0-0'.
Yes you do need to add a CFB in CM with a name that matches whatever
you set in the 'register' command under the sccp profile on the router.
-Ryan
On Jan 25, 2008, at 3:20 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
I've got a 3845 with a PVDM2-64 as far as I can tell. Well, that's
what I ordered and I trust Cisco! A "show voice dsp" shows the
following:
DSP DSP DSPWARE CURR BOOT
PAK TX/RX
TYPE NUM CH CODEC VERSION STATE STATE RST AI VOICEPORT TS ABRT
PACK COUNT
===== === == ========= ======= ===== ======= === == ========= == ====
============
C5510 001 01 g711ulaw 9.2.2 busy idle 0 0 0/0/0:23 23
0 11621/11516
C5510 001 02 g711ulaw 9.2.2 busy idle 0 0 0/1/0:23 22
0 63104/64754
C5510 001 03 g711ulaw 9.2.2 busy idle 0 0 0/0/0:23 07
0 4906/4634
C5510 001 04 None 9.2.2 idle idle 0 0
0 0/0
<snip>
C5510 004 15 None 9.2.2 idle idle 0 0
0 0/0
C5510 004 16 None 9.2.2 idle idle 0 0
0 0/0
------------------------END OF FLEX VOICE CARD 0
----------------------------
I gather that each DSP can handle 16 voice calls, so if I have two
T1s = 23 calls * 2 (each has their own Dchannel)=46 calls / 16 = 2.875.
So that means three DSPs are required to handle my voice calls and I
have one left for conferencing.
Do I just create a DSP farm with one DSP and somehow assign it as a
conference resource in Call Manager?
Lelio
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo
buffalo." WJR
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080125/d7eee83d/attachment.html
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list