[cisco-voip] Video Conferencing ? CM 4.1(3)

[Scott Voll]

one of our districts bought some Sony's.  Not sure on the model and IMHO I
would not buy one.  Bad design.  mic was built into the platform and caused
serious echo issues.

Scott

On Jan 30, 2008 11:21 AM, Leetun, Rob <rleetun at bouldercounty.org> wrote:

>  Has anyone used the Sony PCS-TL50 as a bridged video solution?
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Robert
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Scott Voll
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 30, 2008 12:06 PM
> *To:* Robert Kulagowski
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Video Conferencing ? CM 4.1(3)
>
>
>
> Most outside world stuff it's a lot easier to run H323 with Gatekeepers.
> we have a state wide network that we do all our VC over IP.  if it's out of
> state we use our Regional Hub to bridge the IP / ISDN.  Depending on weather
> you want to do three way or better conferencing and don't have a service
> provider that can you it for you.... you may look at the cuvc or radvision
> or there are a couple others I'm forgetting right now.  Tandbergs do have a
> three way bridge build in if you want to use that.
>
>
>
> Scott
>
> On Jan 30, 2008 7:30 AM, Robert Kulagowski <rkulagow at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Matthew Saskin wrote:
> > Ditto that for the Polycom's.  If I recall correctly, the polycom H.323
> > load also has the ability for it to route outbound calls via the
> > CallManager, so that a gatekeeper isn't necessary.
> >
> > For the easiest integration with either vendor, just order the endpoint
> > with the SCCP load on it.  From there, they have a plugin you run on the
> > CallManager to load the new device type, then when you go to add a phone
> > you'll have a new phone type of Tandberg Video Endpoint (for example).
>
> How complicated does it get once you need to talk to the outside world
> though?  If I have a SCCP endpoint connected via ethernet and haven't
> pulled a PRI to the endpoint, then I'm assuming that this is where
> devices like the CUVC 3545 comes into play?  In CM, is it just
> configured as a MGCP gateway?
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<http://portal.mxlogic.com/redir/?atT64nAnQnzqtT6n3hPuX2pIDeqR4INpKNnwqj-f0T1dnoovaAVgtHBFkJkKpH9oTvHTKzteWtXCXCXiFqFsPmiNsxlK5LE2BCX5u1FfUY3joVZMsrhjKyejLtd4SMedwLQzh0qmXiFqFsPmiNFtd40pAxZjh09lwXYvxqk29Ew96y0i6Ph0NO9EEpd59KvxYY1NJ4SyrjKUOUqerTopdKoUd>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080130/8aeeb6f5/attachment.html